Wildwood
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (LIVE) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (LIVE) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #4 80 Watch R 68 59/14/30 | #1 81 Watch R 70 55/19/29 | #1 84 Watch R 76 28/61/14 | #3 92 Watch R 94 53/43/7 | #2 92 Watch R 96 54/44/5 | #2 92 Watch R 95 53/44/6 | #2 92 Watch R 95 54/44/5 | #1 92 Watch R 95 56/41/6 | #1 92 Watch R 96 54/44/5 | #3 91 Watch R 92 52/43/8 | #3 92 Watch R 94 50/47/6 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 This might be the most impressive filmmaking I’ve ever seen. That scene at the end showing how they made the film really tied it all together and actually made me emotional. 16 years of hard work and love handcrafted making this. This is also the most important film recently… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.915 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it impressive, gorgeous, heartfelt, and a 10/10; urges others to see it and plans another viewing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it most impressive filmmaking, 10/10, urges others to see it, will rewatch. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Gives it 10/10, calls it among the most impressive filmmaking ever, urges others to see it, and plans to rewatch. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter gives it a 10/10, praises the filmmaking and villain, and urges others to see it. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a gorgeous 10/10 and urges others to see it again. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it gorgeous, heartfelt, and a 10/10, urges others to see it, and plans to watch it again. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it the most impressive filmmaking, 10/10, emotional, and says they'll see it again and urges others to see it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a 10/10 film, praises the filmmaking, and urges others to go see it. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 The beheading and sword through a coyote's mouth made me pause a bit but I'm glad they didn't pull those punches. It makes the story actually have some weight to it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.612 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film for not softening violence, saying it gives the story weight. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Approves of the violent scenes, saying they give the story real weight. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's willingness to include violent moments, saying it gives the story weight and that they're glad it didn't pull punches. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film for not pulling punches with its dark elements, noting it adds weight to the story. Grok 4.7: positive — Glad the film kept violent punches; it gives the story weight. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They appreciate the film’s willingness to include shocking violence, saying it gives the story weight. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter was glad the violent scenes weren't toned down and says they give the story weight, a favorable verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film for not pulling punches, stating it gives the story weight. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Agreed. It was needed imo for Curtis’s character as well. Going from playing make believe to seeing it first hand and having to participate. That scene when he travels through the gorgeous areas and into the war might have been my favorite scene. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.878 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the scene’s character development and gorgeous visuals, calling it potentially their favorite. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends a story choice and names a favorite scene, calling it gorgeous; clear appreciation of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Defends a scene as necessary for the character and calls it possibly their favorite scene, showing appreciation for the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a character arc, calls the visuals gorgeous, and highlights a favorite scene. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene their favorite and praises its gorgeous imagery. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the scene as gorgeous and possibly their favorite, and say it was needed for Curtis’s character. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.878 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises character development and describes a scene as a favorite. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #3 w 0.5 The battle itself was one of my favorites. But Curtis killing his first animal/person and grappling with that fact was amazing. You could tell even through the clay that this kid just developed trauma. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.67 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the battle as a favorite and Curtis’s trauma portrayal as amazing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the battle a favorite and praises Curtis's trauma scene as amazing; dark content praised. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the battle a favorite and Curtis's trauma arc amazing, praising the film's execution including the expressive clay animation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the battle scene, emotional weight, and expressive clay animation. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the battle and a trauma scene as amazing favorites. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the battle and Curtis’s traumatic character moment as favorites and amazing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter names the battle as a favorite and calls the Curtis trauma arc 'amazing', praising the film's content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises specific aspects of the film, calling them 'favorites' and 'amazing'. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #4 w 0.447 That scene you're talking about immediately reminded me of Mulan, when it cuts to the post-battle scene mid musical. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.527 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.52 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares a scene to Mulan without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares a scene to Mulan without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only draws a comparison to a scene in Mulan; it gives no judgement of Wildwood itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely compares a scene to Mulan without expressing any judgment or opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene comparison to Mulan; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares a scene to Mulan without expressing an opinion about Wildwood. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison to Mulan scene structure; no judgement of Wildwood's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a scene comparison to another movie without judging the film itself. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 The last ad before the movie started playing was that ugly choppy AI Fanta ad, and the transition between that and handcrafted beauty of tiny Portland was pretty jarring. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.67 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s handcrafted visual beauty, contrasting it favorably with an ugly AI advertisement. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film's visuals 'handcrafted beauty', which is praise for the film. The criticism targets the ad, not the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film 'handcrafted beauty' in contrast to an ugly AI ad; the praise is of the film itself, though brief. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film's visuals as 'handcrafted beauty' in contrast to an ugly pre-movie ad. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film’s handcrafted beauty versus an ugly ad. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s handcrafted depiction of Portland beautiful; the criticism is aimed at the preceding ad and transition. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a pre-movie Fanta ad and the jarring transition; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's handcrafted beauty by contrasting it with an ugly AI ad. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Saw it today, and I also cried because of how lovingly it had been crafted. Seeing how much devotion had gone into it made me emotional! I've sent messages to all my friends begging them to see it, because it would be tragic to see something so beautiful flop, but I really… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.952 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises its beautiful, loving craftsmanship and enthusiastically urges friends to see it despite concerns about its commercial success. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Cried at how lovingly crafted it was, calls it beautiful, begs friends to see it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was moved by the film's craftsmanship, calls it beautiful, and is actively urging friends to see it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film beautiful and lovingly crafted, and is begging friends to go see it. Grok 4.7: positive — Cried at its loving craft, called it beautiful, and begged friends to see it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s beauty and craftsmanship and enthusiastically urge friends to see it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter cried from the film's loving craft, urges friends to see it, and calls it beautiful. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Cried from how lovingly crafted it was, begged friends to see it, and called it amazing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #7 w 0.354 I don't think it can be overstated how absolutely gorgeous this film was. The final battle was one of the most beautiful spectacles I've seen on screen in a fair amount of time. The cast was strong across the board and the story was very dark when it had to be. If I had one… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.93 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Strong praise for visuals, cast, and dark storytelling outweighs a minor pacing complaint. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Strong praise for visuals, cast, story; minor pacing complaint explicitly forgiven. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Heavy praise for visuals, final battle, cast, and story; only a minor complaint about pacing, which they forgive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Strong praise for visuals, cast, and story, explicitly forgiving a minor pacing complaint. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises visuals, cast, and story; forgives pacing drag. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for the visuals, cast, and story outweighs a minor complaint that it dragged at times. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Strong praise for visuals, battle, and cast; one minor complaint about pacing, overall leaning positive and forgiving. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's visuals, cast, and story, dismissing minor pacing issues because it was amazing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #8 w 0.333 One of the most incredible aspects in The Battle of Plinth is how we're seeing multiple forms of warfare in action by both man and animal. It reminded me of the battle scenes from Sergei Bondarchuk's 1965-1967 epic adaptation of War and Peace ! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.796 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the battle's depiction of warfare as incredible and compares it favorably to an epic film adaptation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the battle scene incredible and compares it favorably to Bondarchuk's War and Peace epic. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the Battle of Plinth sequence 'one of the most incredible aspects' and favorably compares it to Bondarchuk's War and Peace battle scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a battle scene in the film as incredible and compares it to an epic masterpiece. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a battle sequence as incredible and compares it favorably to a classic epic. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s battle scenes as incredible and make a favorable comparison to War and Peace. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the battle aspects 'incredible' and compares them favorably to a classic epic; clear praise of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses battle scenes and cinematography without giving a verdict on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 There was a scene in the middle of the battle act where one of the bandits, I think the one with the afro, saves Curtis from a coyote and then the coyote bit her in the hand. I thought they were going to use this moment to have Curtis have a hero moment but they really just the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.19 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.25 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the animated human-coyote fight as pretty cool, appreciating its sustained animalistic brutality. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Describes a scene and praises it as 'pretty cool,' appreciating the brutal human-coyote fight animation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls a specific fight scene 'pretty cool' and appreciates the animation choices, a favorable judgment on part of the film, though mostly describing plot. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific battle scene, calling the choice to animate the animalistic fight 'pretty cool'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the brutal animalistic fight as pretty cool. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the animated human-and-coyote fight pretty cool, expressing clear praise for a scene in the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.19 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter thought the animated animalistic fight scene was pretty cool. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #10 w 0.302 Without a doubt. What was shocking was how visceral and violent the battle got. There were real bludgeonings happening throughout this fight. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.709 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes the battle’s shocking violence without clearly praising or criticizing the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with an unknown prior point and describes the battle's violence without clearly praising or criticising the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Agrees emphatically ('Without a doubt') and describes the violent battle as shocking and visceral, which reads as praise rather than criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the shocking violence of a battle scene without stating whether they liked the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Affirms the film and praises the battle's visceral violence. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the battle’s violence but gives no clear opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the fight as shocking and visceral, implying approval of the violent content; 'without a doubt' signals agreement with a positive view. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the visceral and violent battle scenes as shocking and impactful. | − | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Laika never misses with the stop motion, every frame of that battle could hang in a gallery VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.483 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.60 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s stop-motion animation and battle imagery as gallery-worthy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Laika's stop-motion animation; says every frame of the battle is gallery-worthy. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's stop-motion artistry, saying every frame of the battle could hang in a gallery; clear admiration for the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastically praises the film's stop-motion animation and visual artistry. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the stop-motion and battle frames as gallery-worthy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for the film’s stop-motion animation and battle visuals. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's stop-motion animation with strong admiration, implying the film's visuals are excellent. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises Laika's stop motion animation and visual quality. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #12 w 0.277 There were times I forgot it was this medium because of how smooth and fluid the animation was. And some of the scenes are just jaw droppingly gorgeous. This wasn't just a great movie, it was an amazing display of artistic talent. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.797 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls it a great movie and praises its gorgeous scenes, fluid animation, and artistic talent. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises smooth animation, gorgeous scenes, and calls it a great movie and amazing artistic display. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the animation as smooth and gorgeous, calls it a great movie and an amazing display of artistic talent. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a 'great movie' and praises its gorgeous, fluid animation and artistic talent. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a great movie and praises gorgeous, fluid animation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the animation, visuals, and movie as amazing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the animation as smooth, gorgeous, and an amazing display of talent, calling it a great movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the animation and visuals, calling it an amazing and great movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #13 w 0.267 It's incredible how they do these climactic final battles from stop motion but still having it feel incredibly technical and thrilling VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.485 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the stop-motion final battles as technically impressive and thrilling. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the stop-motion climactic battle as incredible, technical, and thrilling. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the stop-motion climactic battle as incredible, technical, and thrilling, indicating clear approval of the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the stop-motion animation and calls the climactic battle incredible, technical, and thrilling. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the climactic battles as incredible, technical, and thrilling. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the stop-motion battle sequences as technically impressive and thrilling. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the climactic battles as incredibly technical and thrilling, a clear admiring verdict on the film's craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's stop motion battles as incredible, technical, and thrilling. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #14 w 0.258 This might be the greatest use of the word bitch in the last 10 years VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.103 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s use of a particular word as exceptionally effective. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically praises a specific line delivery as the greatest in a decade, implying enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a use of the word 'bitch' in the film possibly the greatest in a decade, implying praise for the film's content. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Praises a single line delivery without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about one line, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film's use of the word as exceptionally good. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment jokes about a word's use in the film without expressing any clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only quotes a specific line from the film without judging the movie itself. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #15 w 0.25 This and the "im some kind of a p-word" def caught me off guard VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes surprise at a quoted moment without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a surprising line without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Only says certain moments caught them off guard; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely references a quote or moment from the film without expressing an overall opinion on its quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a line caught them off guard; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They mention being caught off guard by a line, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only notes surprising moments and a quoted line; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only mentions specific moments that caught them off guard without judging the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Someone in my audience brought their little kids to watch this movie with them and that made them gasp. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.63 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an audience reaction and children attending, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about audience members bringing kids; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about kids in the audience gasping; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation expressed. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares an anecdote about the audience's reaction without expressing an opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes kids gasping; no judgment of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an audience reaction to children attending, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an audience member's reaction to kids watching; no judgement of the film's quality or whether to recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only describes audience reaction without giving an opinion on the film itself. | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 They didn’t expect a swear word after a kid strips naked and kills himself? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.572 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions expectations about profanity relative to disturbing content, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic remark about other viewers' reactions to content; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic remark about a scene and swearing; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke or observation about the plot/rating without judging the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Sarcastic remark about a scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an unexpected swear word in a scene, without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment questions an expectation about a scene's content; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene and content without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I love that the movie kinda puts both the opening scene and the bitch scene early on. Really helps set the mood that this movie will br a bit different from other animated features. And it gets cemented when The General gets shot and killed out of the air with little fanfare. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.509 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the early scenes for establishing a distinctive mood and differentiating the film from other animated features. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loves how early scenes set a distinctive, darker mood that sets the film apart from other animated features. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they love how early scenes set a distinct mood and praises the film's different, bold approach among animated features. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they love how the movie's early scenes effectively set its unique mood. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loves the film's early tone-setting and distinctiveness from other animated features. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s unusual early scenes and say they effectively establish its distinctive mood. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.509 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises multiple aspects of the film and how it sets its mood. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 did they have the same reaction when 2 people were dropped to their deaths or when others were exploding VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks about reactions to violent events without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Question about audience reactions to violent scenes; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A rhetorical question about plot events (deaths, explosions) with no stated judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses events or reactions without expressing any opinion or verdict on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Rhetorical plot question about reactions, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — References reactions to violent scenes but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A rhetorical question about others' reactions to violent scenes; it does not state a verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details and violence without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 Buddy and now this. The word is seeing its peak. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Comments on a word’s popularity without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about a word's popularity, with no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Implies Wildwood and 'Buddy' are part of a peak era ('The word is seeing its peak'), an enthusiastic, approving remark about the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment appears to be a joke or remark about marketing/news rather than a review of the unseen film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cryptic aside with no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses excitement about Wildwood alongside something else, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Cryptic remark about the film's peak without clearly judging the film itself; ambiguous and not a clear like or dislike. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses world events or general sentiment rather than evaluating the film Wildwood. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #21 w 0.213 I think the "sudden fatality" award for the year goes to that eagle. We knew going in that the movie was going to be more intense than the average animated family movie, but I don't think most of us expected it to be quite as bloody as it ended up being (not that this was a bad… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.881 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Approves of the film’s unexpectedly bloody intensity, explicitly noting that it was not a bad thing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes the surprising bloodiness and explicitly says it wasn't a bad thing, a mildly approving take. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Notes the surprising bloody intensity but explicitly says it wasn't a bad thing; mild approval, though no overall recommendation is stated. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter notes the movie's unexpected intensity and bloodiness, explicitly clarifying that this was not a bad thing at all. Grok 4.7: positive — Notes unexpected bloodiness but explicitly says that was not a bad thing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They approve of the film being bloodier and more intense than expected, saying that was not a bad thing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.881 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter notes the film is intense and bloody, explicitly stating 'not that this was a bad thing at all'. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #22 w 0.209 I did find it sweet how in the credits they showed that a statue was built in her memory. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.67 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the memorial reveal in the credits sweet, expressing appreciation for the film’s touching detail. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Mild appreciation of a credits detail, but no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Calls a credits detail sweet, but this is a comment on one small element, not an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter finds one specific detail in the credits sweet, without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a credits memorial detail sweet, a mild positive reaction. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe a moment in the film as sweet, expressing a positive reaction to it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter finds the credits' memorial statue touching, a warm reaction to the film's ending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter mentions a detail from the credits without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 Ah, I didn’t stay for the credits and was saying to my friends it was disappointing that nobody seemed to care about the giant eagle, so that’s nice to see. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.826 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a plot concern resolved during the credits, without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail resolved after the credits; mild gripe now addressed, no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot detail (the giant eagle) and a credits payoff, without giving an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a minor plot point resolved in the credits without giving an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Credits and eagle reaction talk, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They comment on characters' apparent lack of concern about the eagle, not on whether they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says it was disappointing that nobody cared about the giant eagle, a criticism of the film's handling of that element. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly calls the film disappointing. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #24 w 0.2 There’s quite a few scenes where characters are just killed so suddenly and brutally. Maybe I’m just a sucker for it, but I like when violence is portrayed like that because it’s so cruel. Like the Eagle being shot down so suddenly after that beautiful flight, or that brief bit… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.414 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s sudden, brutal violence as effectively conveying cruelty. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's sudden, brutal portrayal of violence as effective and impactful. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly likes the sudden, brutal violence and cites specific scenes approvingly, indicating appreciation of the film's choices. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked the sudden, brutal portrayal of violence in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film’s sudden, brutal violence as effective and cruel. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s sudden, cruel violence and say they like how it is portrayed. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.414 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the sudden and brutal violence in the film, stating they like it. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #25 w 0.196 To me it really highlighted how few 'family movies' have real peril in them lately. The stakes in this felt incredibly high, right from the first scene. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s genuine peril and immediately high stakes, contrasting it favorably with other family movies. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's genuine peril and high stakes, contrasting it favorably with other family movies. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film for having real peril and high stakes, contrasting it favorably with other recent family movies. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film for having genuinely high stakes and real peril compared to other family movies. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's high stakes and real peril from the start. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film's high stakes and real sense of peril. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film for real peril and high stakes, implying approval of its tension as a family movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film for having real peril and high stakes, unlike typical family movies. | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #26 w 0.192 It’s honest, is what it is. Most real life deaths don’t give you space for tragic last words. Lives just stop, and that’s the real tragedy of it. I appreciate it in fiction too. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.557 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.39 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Appreciates the film’s honest depiction of death without contrived tragic last words. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's honest, abrupt depiction of death and says they appreciate it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's honest depiction of death and says they appreciate it, implying approval of the film's choice. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises and appreciates the honest, realistic way death is portrayed in the work. Grok 4.7: positive — Appreciates the film's honest, realistic portrayal of sudden death. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They appreciate the film’s honest portrayal of sudden, unceremonious death. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film as honest and says they appreciate its approach to death in fiction. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Appreciates the film's realistic and honest portrayal of death in fiction. | − | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 Yeah it really doesn’t sugarcoat violence. Even in the scenes where the violence is justified, it’s still ugly and brutal. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.834 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes the film’s unflinching depiction of violence without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's brutal violence without clearly praising or criticizing the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's depiction of violence as ugly and brutal without stating whether they liked it or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the portrayal of violence without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes unsugarcoated violence without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Observes that the film depicts violence as ugly and brutal without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film's violence as ugly and brutal without stating whether the commenter liked or would recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the film's violence without expressing a clear like, dislike, or recommendation. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 Literal gut punch when it happened :( VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.44 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses an emotional reaction to an event without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to a scene, but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes emotional impact of a scene ambiguously, with no clear judgment of the film itself; sad content isn't a negative, and no explicit praise or criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Ambiguous emotional reaction without enough context to determine if it refers to an effective film scene or external production news. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Emotional reaction to a plot moment, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to an event, but gives no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking moment emotionally but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Describes a powerful emotional impact, which indicates a strong engagement with the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #29 w 0.183 If I had a dollar every time Angela Bassett’s character dies as a climax of a battle, I’d have 2 dollars VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Makes a joke about a character’s death without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about Angela Bassett's recurring character deaths; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about a recurring character death trope; it gives no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a plot point without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about the actress's roles, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about Angela Bassett character deaths; it expresses no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about a character dying repeatedly in battles; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/trivia about an actor's roles without judging the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 Sudden unicycle-riding-bagpipe-playing Darth Vader jumpscare (who apparently actually exists). VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a surprising scene and notes a real-world reference without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a surprising scene or reference; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Humorous remark about a surprising scene and a real-life trivia detail; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a cameo/scene from the movie or trailer without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a bizarre scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a surprising character appearance without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a jumpscare moment and a trivia-like aside about the character existing; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a specific scene without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 Yep, they exist flames and all. Keep weird, Portland. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment jokes about Portland and something existing, without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment jokes about Portland and something existing; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment appears to be about a real-world Portland detail or trivia, with no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about Portland without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — No judgment of the film; just a Portland aside. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A playful remark about Portland, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a casual remark about Portland's weirdness, with no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a local joke/reference and contains no judgment of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 As soon as he said isn't Portland Kind of Weird this was the first video I thought of and I'm happy they immediately had them pass by VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.528 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses happiness about a specific reference, but offers no overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a Portland reference and enjoying a callback; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares an association with a reference in the film and is happy about a moment, but gives no overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific joke or reference in the trailer/film without giving an overall verdict on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Happy about one reference gag, not a film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a reference to a video and being glad it appeared, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter references a reference/callback to another video and is happy about a moment, but gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific scene/reference without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 You will address him as the Unipiper. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.48 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A joking correction about someone's title, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing a character or cameo (the Unipiper); no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line about a character's name, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke/trivia reference with no judgment or opinion expressed about the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or reference with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous instruction with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a line from the film with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quote from the film, no judgement or review provided. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 That whole opening made me think Portland looks awesome VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment praises Portland’s appearance, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments that Portland looks appealing in the opening, without judging the film's overall quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises how Portland looks in the opening, but doesn't give an overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film's opening sequence for making the setting look awesome. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes Portland looks good in the opening, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise Portland's appearance, but don't express an opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the film's depiction of Portland but gives no overall judgement of the movie itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the depiction of the setting from the film's opening. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #35 w 0.167 The dream of the 90's is alive in Portland. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A pop-culture reference about Portland, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A Portlandia reference joke about the Portland setting, with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Quip referencing Portland's 90s vibe (Portlandia reference); no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke referencing the TV show 'Portlandia' with no judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Portland, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A reference to Portland, without an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Vague reference to the film's setting or theme; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/reference about Portland without judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 I got to see this at an early screening This movie is truly food for the soul in a world of AI. To see something so stunning made by human hands is a treasure. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.874 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film stunning, food for the soul, and a treasure made by human hands. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film stunning, 'food for the soul' and a treasure of human craftsmanship. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film 'food for the soul' and 'stunning', a treasure made by human hands; clear praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the film, calling it stunning, a treasure, and 'food for the soul'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film stunning, soulful, and a treasure. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie a treasure and praises its stunning, human-made artistry. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film stunning and a treasure, praising it strongly despite the AI framing. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie as food for the soul and a stunning treasure made by human hands. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #37 w 0.162 It's heartwarming yet beautiful to see the montage of the many components and faces done by human hands in the credits. Seeing the art made by one's own hands be brought to life is quite honestly one of the greatest things humans can do. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.952 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the credits montage heartwarming and beautiful, expressing admiration for the film’s handcrafted artistry. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the credits montage of handmade craftsmanship as heartwarming and beautiful, showing appreciation of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the credits montage of handmade art as heartwarming and beautiful, expressing clear appreciation for the film's craftsmanship. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the heartwarming and beautiful credits montage and the stop-motion artistry of the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the handmade credits montage as beautiful and heartwarming. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe the film’s credits montage as heartwarming and beautiful, expressing clear admiration for the artistry. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the credits montage heartwarming and beautiful, praising the handmade artistry the film showcases. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's credits and artistic creation as one of the greatest things humans can do. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #38 w 0.16 The lady selling her artwork in Portland - with the sign saying something like "handmade art, get it before it's gone for good" - struck me as commentary on AI. It felt very appropriate. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.527 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.16 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets a scene as appropriate commentary on AI without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets one scene as AI commentary; calling it appropriate praises a detail, not the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Observes a thematic detail (possible AI commentary) and calls it appropriate, but gives no overall judgement of the film or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific background detail and its thematic meaning without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Interprets a scene detail as AI commentary; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s apparent AI commentary as appropriate. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of a scene as AI commentary; no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a thematic detail without expressing a judgment or verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #39 w 0.158 https://x.com/edgerton_harvey/status/2113460779240599819 The Author and the Illustrator of the Book got cameo's in that scene! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Shares trivia about the book’s author and illustrator making cameos, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about author and illustrator cameos without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about the book's author and illustrator cameoing in a scene, with no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares trivia about a cameo without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about book creators' cameos; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares trivia about the book creators’ cameos, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only shares a link and trivia about cameos in a scene; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Shares a trivia link about book author cameos without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 Broke: Amandla Stenberg’s character (the bandit girl with the Afro) is in a gay relationship Woke: The Governor and his creepy administrative assistant are in a gay relationship. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about characters’ relationships without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke/meme about character relationships; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about character relationships in the film; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about character relationships without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about character pairings, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about character relationships, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment notes characters' relationships as a plot/casting observation with a sarcastic framing, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses characters and politics without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 Heated Bureaucracy VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The brief phrase offers no clear judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A short phrase, likely a joke or a reference to the plot, with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Just a short phrase, 'Heated Bureaucracy', with no clear judgment of the film; reads as a joke or label. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A two-word phrase or joke with no clear opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Two-word phrase with no stated judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A phrase without an evaluative judgment about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is just a two-line phrase with no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a short, vague phrase without any judgment on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #42 w 0.152 Saw this on Monday and still can't get over how much I loved it. Its honestly the best feeling when a film you've been eagerly anticipating for years lives up to the hype and beyond. The sheer scale and craftsmanship on display in this film is just mind boggling. It's just stop… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.663 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Loved it, praises exceptional stop-motion craftsmanship and darker themes, and says it exceeded high expectations. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved it; praises stop motion craftsmanship, scale, and dark themes as strengths; lived up to hype. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they loved it, that it exceeded the hype, and praises the stop motion craftsmanship and the dark, brutal tone as strengths. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, praising its craftsmanship, stop-motion scale, and dark themes. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it, lived up to hype; praises craft, story, and dark violence. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they loved it, praise its craftsmanship and story, and describe its dark violence as a strength. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.663 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and praises its scale, craftsmanship, and story. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Yeah, I did not expect to watch a child commit suicide in the first 2 minutes of the film. Really sets the tone though! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.338 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.06 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening scene and its tone-setting role without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shocked reaction to a disturbing opening; 'sets the tone' is wry commentary, not a clear judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening scene and says it sets the tone, but gives no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening scene and notes it sets the tone, without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a shocking opening and tone without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening and its effect without clearly judging whether the film is good or recommendable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a disturbing opening scene with sarcasm but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment expresses shock at a plot point and sarcasm about the tone without clearly judging the overall film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #44 w 0.149 What surprised me most honestly is that when they get to the governess’s backstory, it turns out she really went to the dark side and decided to put the boy’s soul in a robot. And he actually couldn’t handle that fact so he killed himself. Like, this movie held next to nothing… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.789 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes surprise at the dark backstory and uncompromising content without explicitly judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Impressed the film held nothing back with its dark governess backstory; praises its boldness with disturbing content. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes plot points and expresses surprise at the film's darkness, but offers no clear judgement of quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses impressed surprise at a dark backstory and praises the movie for holding nothing back. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film for not holding back on dark plot turns. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking plot reveal and the film’s willingness to show it, without clearly judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.789 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing the plot without expressing a clear opinion or recommendation about the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 RIP that poor archer who got dropped to his death by the crows. of all the deaths in the film this was the one that got me the most for some reason. some of the coyote deaths were gnarlier, but played just a little bit sillier. and then nah this guy just gets fuckin splatted. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.021 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses emotional reactions to character deaths without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses an affecting death scene and compares deaths, but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a specific death scene and its impact, but gives no overall judgement or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses specific death scenes in the movie without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses character deaths without judging the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe and compare deaths in the film but give no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses specific death scenes and how they hit them, but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene and character deaths without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | 0 | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 This got me too, and I think it's because he is shown saying goodbye to his wife and small child like 10 minutes prior. He didn't get a lot of screen time, but it was enough to show the magnitude of what was being lost. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s economical characterization for conveying the magnitude of a loss and creating emotional impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says a character's death affected them emotionally and credits the film's effective setup; implicit praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses an emotional scene and why it worked for them, but gives no overall verdict on the film or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the emotional impact and effective characterization of a brief scene. Grok 4.7: positive — Moved by the scene; praises how the loss landed emotionally. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the scene emotionally affected them and effectively conveyed the magnitude of the loss. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a scene's emotional effect and storytelling reasoning but gives no clear judgement of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character's emotional scene without evaluating the film itself. | − | − | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 Just saw this in a Portland theatre and there was applause throughout the end credits. Hometown heroes and all, haha The movie itself is exceptional. Visually stunning the entire time but especially the giant set piece at the climax. Definitely worth seeing in the theater (even… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.052 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film exceptional and visually stunning, recommends theaters, and appreciates its unexpectedly intense content. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it exceptional and visually stunning, recommends theater viewing; the intensity is framed as good. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the movie exceptional, visually stunning, and worth seeing in theaters; the intense violence is framed as a good thing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calls the movie exceptional, visually stunning, and definitely worth seeing in theaters, praising its intensity in a good way. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film exceptional, visually stunning, and worth seeing in theaters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie exceptional and visually stunning, and recommends seeing it in theaters; the intense violence is praised. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.052 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie exceptional, visually stunning, and definitely worth seeing. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #48 w 0.143 Exactly this. Really giving watership down. Those rabbits knew how to kill !! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.507 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares the film to Watership Down and comments on violent rabbits without expressing approval or disapproval. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with another comment and jokes about a Watership Down comparison; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares the film to Watership Down and jokes about killer rabbits; no clear judgement of Wildwood itself, though tone is vaguely appreciative. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Compares the tone to Watership Down and comments on that film's content without giving a verdict on Wildwood. Grok 4.7: positive — Enthusiastic comparison to Watership Down's violent intensity praises the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — It compares the film to Watership Down and comments on the rabbits, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Comparing it to Watership Down and praising the rabbits' lethal violence signals enjoyment of the film's dark content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comparing the movie's vibe to another film without expressing a direct verdict on the movie itself. | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Western doctors... I was dying inside. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Reacts to a specific line or moment without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a specific line or scene, laughing or cringing, without judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Vague remark about 'Western doctors' with 'dying inside' could be cringe or a plot reaction; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to a specific element or scene without offering an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cryptic reaction or quote without a clear film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is too ambiguous to tell whether “dying inside” expresses a judgment about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment references a scene about Western doctors with 'dying inside' but gives no clear judgement of the film itself; ambiguous and likely a joke. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quote from the film or off-topic reaction, no clear judgment on the movie. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 Hit soooo close to home as a native portlander. Goddamn. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The emphatic reaction suggests the film resonated strongly with them as a Portland native. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the film resonated deeply on a personal level; the emotional exclamation implies strong appreciation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the film hit very close to home as a native Portlander, implying emotional resonance and appreciation, though no explicit recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses strong personal resonance with the film's representation of Portland. Grok 4.7: positive — Strong personal resonance as a Portlander implies the film landed powerfully. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the film resonated deeply with them as a Portland native. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter relates personally as a Portlander but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Relatable and impactful connection to the film's setting. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #51 w 0.139 This movie has to win an Oscar nomination. Besides odyssey, no movie has had me sit through the credits thinking of each scene and talking it out and every little detail I saw or didn’t. This may be my movie of the year and I cannot imagine a better looking “animated movie”… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.401 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a potential movie of the year, praises its animation, and says it deserves an Oscar nomination. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it Oscar-worthy, possibly movie of the year, best-looking animated film; strong enthusiastic praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise: deserves an Oscar nomination, possibly movie of the year, and praised as exceptionally good-looking and thought-provoking. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastic praise calling it a potential movie of the year and Oscar contender with unmatched animation. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it movie of the year and Oscar-worthy, praising every detail. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s visuals and lingering impact, calling it a possible movie of the year and Oscar-worthy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it possibly their movie of the year, deserving an Oscar nomination, and praises its visuals strongly. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it their movie of the year and praises its visuals and impact. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #52 w 0.137 It infuriates me that it is so so rare for animated films to get nominated for Best Picture. Always relegated to Best Animated Feature. But Wildwood deserves it more than any in recent memory. I cried from the beauty of it. Because People made this. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.875 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls Wildwood deserving of Best Picture and says its beauty moved them to tears. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says it deserves Best Picture, cried from its beauty; frustration is about awards, not the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says Wildwood deserves a Best Picture nomination more than any recent film and that they cried from its beauty. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's beauty, saying it moved them to tears and deserves a Best Picture nomination. Grok 4.7: positive — Says Wildwood deserves Best Picture and praises its beauty. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls Wildwood more deserving of a Best Picture nomination than recent films and says its beauty made them cry. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film deserves Best Picture and that they cried from its beauty, clearly praising it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's beauty, saying it deserves a Best Picture nomination more than any recent film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 0 shot it doesn't get an oscar nom. an oscar win? honestly i'm gonna be disappointed if it doesn't, but perhaps i am just a little biased. really glad to hear you enjoyed it! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.873 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Expects an Oscar nomination and would be disappointed without a win, indicating strong praise for the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter expects Oscar nomination, hopes for win; clearly thinks highly of the film despite admitted bias. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter expects an Oscar win and would be disappointed otherwise, implying strong admiration for the film, though bias is admitted. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter thinks the film is worthy of an Oscar win and nomination. Grok 4.7: positive — Expects Oscar nomination and win; strongly praises the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They strongly expect Oscar recognition and say they would be disappointed if the film did not win. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about Oscar nominations and win odds; reply praises a reader's enjoyment but gives no direct verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Predicts Oscar nomination and win, and expresses disappointment if it doesn't win. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #54 w 0.135 I went in blind and did not know that I was walking into a pg13 film, so watching that opening scene had me questioning what exactly I was getting into lol. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.077 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.50 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes surprise at the opening scene and rating without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes surprise at the opening scene and rating without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter describes their surprise at the film's rating and opening scene, but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares an anecdote about being surprised by the rating/opening scene without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Surprise at rating and opening; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe surprise at the opening scene but do not judge the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on surprise at the PG-13 rating and opening scene, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses surprise at the rating of an opening scene without expressing an opinion on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Me too. With my 7 year old lol. That’s on me. Beautiful movie which my daughter handled very well. She came out saying, “That was the best movie ever!” VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.927 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a beautiful movie and shares their daughter's enthusiastic praise. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a beautiful movie; daughter called it the best movie ever. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it a beautiful movie and reports their daughter said it was the best movie ever. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film a 'beautiful movie' and notes their daughter called it 'the best movie ever.' Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film beautiful and shares enthusiastic praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a beautiful movie and shares an enthusiastic reaction from their daughter. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it a beautiful movie and reports their daughter loved it, calling it the best ever. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a beautiful movie and notes their daughter said it was the best ever. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #56 w 0.132 Don’t feel bad, I took my 4-year-old. After that opening scene, I just thought, “Well, I fucked up,” but luckily, 98% of the movie went over her head. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses suitability for their child and reaction to the opening, without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about bringing a young child to an intense opening scene; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — VADER 0.128 Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the movie's age appropriateness for a young child without stating an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses bringing a child, not whether they liked the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They regret taking a young child but don’t express an overall opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.128 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses taking their child and the child's reaction, but expresses no clear opinion on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #57 w 0.131 me after seeing Coyote v ACME: man I fucking love coyotes me after seeing this: man I fucking hate coyotes VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about hating coyotes after watching, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about coyote characters being villainous; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about hating the coyotes (likely villainous characters) in the film; no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A joke reacting to the coyote characters as antagonists without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about hating coyotes after the film, not a judgment of it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses a reaction to coyotes, not an opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about Coyote v. ACME, not a judgement of Wildwood itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke comparing two movies without expressing a clear verdict on Wildwood. | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 Was a little sad that the movie traded in the bad stereotypes of certain animals. Especially the crows. There was at least the one sympathetic coyote but the crows were just straight up evil tools of the Governess. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.735 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Expresses disappointment that the film relies on negative animal stereotypes, especially its portrayal of crows. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mild criticism of the film's reliance on animal stereotypes, with no counterbalancing praise of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the film for relying on bad animal stereotypes, especially the crows, expressing disappointment, with only slight credit for one sympathetic coyote. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter expresses disappointment about how the movie relied on negative animal stereotypes. Grok 4.7: negative — Soft disappointment that the film relies on bad animal stereotypes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for relying on negative animal stereotypes, especially its portrayal of crows. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.735 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with the movie's use of animal stereotypes. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #59 w 0.129 Man I loved the coyotes design in this film. Them in their uniforms marching in a unit was just awesome to watch VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the coyotes’ design and calls their uniformed marching awesome to watch. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for the coyotes' design and marching scenes; no criticism of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the coyote design and found the marching scenes awesome to watch, praising the film's visuals. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the character design and visuals in the film as awesome. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the coyote designs and found the marching scene awesome. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the coyotes’ design and say watching them march was awesome. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the coyote design and calls the marching scene awesome to watch. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the design and found it awesome. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #60 w 0.128 I'm not saying they're perfect people, but the world would be a better place if more people like Travis Knight/his father used their money to fund passion projects like Laika rather than use it to fund political propaganda or bullshit AI data centres or any of the other shit… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.257 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises funding passion projects and Laika, but offers no judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Travis Knight funding Laika, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises Travis Knight/his father for funding Laika as a general point about wealth use, but gives no judgement of Wildwood itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises the funding of the studio Laika, but expresses no opinion on the film Wildwood itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises studio funding choices, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises the funding of Laika passion projects, but gives no opinion on Wildwood itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Praises Laika and the Knight family's funding choices, but says nothing about the film Wildwood itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the studio's funding and philanthropy rather than judging the film itself. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 Holy shit Wildwood was one of the best Western animated movies I’ve seen. I knew Wildwood was PG-13, but I was still surprised by how dark and violent the movie got. In many ways, Wildwood reminded me of Princess Mononoke. Both movies have a protagonist thrown in the middle of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.735 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it one of the best Western animated movies and prefers it to Princess Mononoke. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it one of the best Western animated movies, rates it above Princess Mononoke; darkness noted approvingly. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it one of the best Western animated movies and says it's stronger than Princess Mononoke for character connection. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states it is one of the best Western animated movies they have ever seen. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it one of the best and stronger than Mononoke. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it one of the best animated movies and says it is stronger than Princess Mononoke. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.735 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it one of the best Western animated movies and stronger than Princess Mononoke. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #62 w 0.126 It's interesting seeing the comments in this post about feeling a lack of catharsis when it came to the Dowager Countess's death, and that negatively impacting people's reception of the film. For me, the lack of catharsis and resolution for her death felt right for the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.972 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Defends the film’s lack of catharsis as fitting, thematically meaningful, and emotionally authentic. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends the unresolved ending as fitting and says it felt so real, rebutting others' criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Defends the film's lack of catharsis as fitting and realistic, says it felt real and resonated personally, countering others' negative reception. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter defends the film's lack of catharsis, praising the character's resolution as feeling authentic and right. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film's unresolved ending as feeling right and real. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the lack of resolution as fitting and say the story felt real to them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.972 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses thematic elements and local context without stating a clear personal verdict on the film. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 Kinda funny because I felt the way that the ivy smothered her body was a way of her being reunited with her son whose corpse had undergone the same fate. She was convinced that the ivy would help return him to her, but in the end it was the other way around. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.179 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.48 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets the ivy imagery and character's fate without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretation of the ending's symbolism with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment interprets a plot point and its symbolism without stating whether they liked or recommend the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment purely discusses plot interpretation and thematic irony without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot interpretation of a scene; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets the symbolism of the ivy and the characters’ fates without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.179 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot interpretation and theory without expressing a judgment or verdict on the film. | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Welp, when I arrived at the theater I saw a family with elementary school children file in a few rows ahead of me. Me: I wonder if they know the movie is PG-13 opening scene has a twelve year old strip naked and commit suicide Me: Well, they know now I guess. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an opening scene and jokes about a family's reaction without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about a family bringing young kids to a dark opening scene; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about a family in the theater and the opening scene's content; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the opening scene and the theater audience without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about kids seeing a dark opening; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening scene and a family’s reaction, but does not judge the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking opening scene and a family in the audience, but gives no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares an anecdotal observation about the audience and content warning without judging the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 Unapologetically brought my elementary school aged kids to this movie. We had a lot of mature themes to discuss, but what a wonder to behold as a kid and this is absolutely a great way to start discussions about grief and letting go. Mufasa getting trampled is far more… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.426 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film a wonder to behold and praises its value for discussing grief and letting go with children. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a wonder to behold and a great way to discuss grief; defends bringing kids. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film as a wonder for kids and a great way to start discussions about grief; recommends it despite mature themes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film 'a wonder to behold' and praises how it handles mature themes. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a wonder and a great way to discuss grief. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film a wonder to behold and a great way to start meaningful discussions. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter brought kids, calls it a wonder and a great way to start discussions; clearly recommends it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a wonder for kids and a great tool for discussions. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #66 w 0.122 Dowager Governess kinda fine though. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.13 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses attraction to a character, not an opinion on the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A remark about a character's attractiveness; it passes no judgement on the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only remarks on a character ('Dowager Governess') being 'kinda fine'; no clear overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only jokes about a character's attractiveness without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character aside only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character's attractiveness without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — "Kinda fine" is lukewarm, neither clearly praising nor criticising the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/meme about a character's appearance, not a judgment on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 Prue and Curtis are stronger better people than me, that’s for certain If this was a live action movie, Alexandra would 1000% be played by Cate Blanchett VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Comments on characters and hypothetical casting without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on characters and a casting joke; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on characters and casting speculation; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses characters and hypothetical live-action casting without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character praise and casting joke, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the characters and fancasting, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Praises characters and casting hypothetical; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses characters and potential casting without giving any verdict on the quality of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 "Why would I deceive you?" VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment quotes dialogue without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Just a quote from the film, with no judgement of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line of dialogue with no opinion or judgement about the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote without any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Bare quote with no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no expressed opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quoted line with no judgement of the film or stated opinion about it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is just a movie quote without any evaluation of the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Getting back from the theater I am just in a daze, calling this level of craftsmanship "beautiful" or "amazing" just feels hollow because of how detailed, how intricate, and how above and beyond each and every part of this story is put together. Some scenes that took my breath… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.99 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the craftsmanship, animation, story, and villain; rates it 9.5/10 and favorite animated film of the year. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Gushing praise of craftsmanship, villain and final battle; rates it 9.5/10, favorite animated film of the year. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Gushing praise for craftsmanship, villain, and animation; rates it 9.5/10 and calls it their favorite animated film of the year. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter gushes over the craftsmanship, villain, and animation, rating the film 9.5/10 and calling it a masterpiece. Grok 4.7: positive — Gushes over craft, loved it, rates 9.5/10 and favorite of the year. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They gush over the film’s craftsmanship and story, call it a masterpiece, and rate it 9.5/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.99 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter deeply praises the film's craftsmanship, animation, and story, calling it a masterpiece and giving it a 9.5/10. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #70 w 0.119 I enjoyed it a lot. Felt it went places you wouldn't expect it to from the off. First third packed in an air of mystery that I felt like the last leg of the movie doesn't really deliver on. The side characters had some nice characterisation for the amount of time we see them… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.914 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite detailed criticisms, they enjoyed it a lot and ultimately call it a special, memorable movie. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it a lot and calls it special despite listing several flaws; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with 'enjoyed it a lot' and ends calling it 'a special movie I'll think about a lot'; criticisms are acknowledged but secondary. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting several character and ending flaws, the commenter opens saying they enjoyed it a lot and calls it special. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it a lot and calls it special despite flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed it a lot and call it a special movie, despite several criticisms and imperfections. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.914 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite noting several flaws, the commenter explicitly states 'I enjoyed it a lot' and calls it 'a special movie'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I'd disagree about Prue. By the end of the film she's definitely haunted by the experience and more mature as a result, rather than her self-assured behavior at the beginning. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.024 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses Prue's character development without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Prue's character arc as interpretation; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Prue's character arc and disagrees on interpretation, but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a character's development and plot points without expressing a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character-arc disagreement only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Prue's character development without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character's arc and disagrees with another commenter's reading, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses character development and plot details without expressing a clear like or dislike of the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #72 w 0.117 There is literally a scene where we see ivy grasp onto a skeleton That scene was just a dream Prue was having after being told the story of Alexei and the Dowager Governess. Though I think their bodies united in death would have been very poetic. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.026 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Clarifies a dream scene and suggests a poetic plot possibility without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot clarification about a dream scene and speculation; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a specific scene and plot interpretation without giving any overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses plot details from the book without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot clarification and a poetic aside, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a scene and a hypothetical poetic image without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion about a scene and its meaning; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a plot point and dream sequence without giving a verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 I spent a good chunk of this movie going "this HAS to be CGI made to look like stop-motion." From a technical standpoint this is without question the greatest movie I have ever seen. That battle scene was.... just left me in disbelief that it was stop motion. But even going… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.877 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a handcrafted masterpiece and one of the best animated movies; criticism targets only a preceding advertisement. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a technical masterpiece and one of the best animated films; only complaint is a pre-movie ad. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a masterpiece, technically perfect, one of the best animated films in a long time, with audience applause; only the pre-film ad was criticized. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film a masterpiece, technically perfect, and one of the best animated movies they've seen. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a technical masterpiece and one of the best animated films. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a technical masterpiece and one of the best animated movies they've seen; the only criticism is the pre-movie ad. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.877 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a technical masterpiece and one of the best animated movies in a long time. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #74 w 0.115 listing my biases now: wildwood has been my favorite book since i was a teenager, carson ellis (the illustrator) is one of my favorite artists, i live in portland and used to live in st. johns (prue’s neighborhood), and laika is my favorite animation studio (because they made… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.975 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.48 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the adaptation, handcrafted animation, and authentic setting, describing a deeply moving and special viewing experience. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic 'WOW', found it special and moving, sobbed, praised faithful handcrafted depiction of St. Johns. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic "WOW", says it was special, faithful to the book and setting, and moved them to tears; clearly loved the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter loved the film, calling it special, meticulously crafted, and emotionally moving. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film special, meticulously crafted, and emotionally moving. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film special, praises its craftsmanship and faithful representation, and describes being moved to tears. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film 'special', says they were sobbing through it, and loves how it represents their favorite book and home. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses deep emotional praise and calls the film special after seeing it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 The use of blood in Wildwood is one of the most creative usages of blood from a narrative and visual standpoint. Prue's blood while red, it represents her humanity and her connection to magic coming in quite handy in being able to quell the Ivy from spreading and saving Mac.… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.002 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s use of blood as exceptionally creative both narratively and visually. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's use of blood as one of the most creative, narratively and visually. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's use of blood as one of the most creative narratively and visually, then analyzes it approvingly. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film's narrative and visual use of blood as one of the most creative. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's creative narrative and visual use of blood. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s use of blood one of the most creative, praising its visual and narrative significance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's use of blood as creative and well-executed from narrative and visual standpoints. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the creative and narrative use of blood in the film. | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #76 w 0.114 I saw this movie today. I liked it a lot, but didn’t love it. The stop motion and animation blend seamlessly and there is so much detail. Every scene and still is layered with details and Easter eggs of Portland (which I loved)! Some of the most beautiful animation Laika has… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.997 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly liked it a lot and recommends it, praising animation despite substantial criticisms of story and protagonist. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Liked it a lot, recommends it, B+ rating despite significant story and protagonist complaints. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Liked it a lot, B+, recommends it despite story complaints and disappointment; leans positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly says they liked it a lot, gives it a B+, and recommends it despite writing flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it a lot, recommends it, rates B+ despite story flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Strongly praises the animation and recommends it, but criticizes the story and protagonist; calls it a solid B+. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.997 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly states 'I liked it a lot', 'Solid B+ movie', and 'I really recommend this movie'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #77 w 0.113 I had the same issues with Prue's characterization. I think her story arc was supposed to be "I'm too old for fairy tales and magic games" to accepting her magical nature? But it kind of falls flat when she never really embraced her abilities, only used them by happenstance, ie… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.076 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes Prue’s underdeveloped character arc and expresses disappointment with her inconsistent behavior. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes Prue's arc as falling flat and expresses disappointment with key scene; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes Prue's characterization and arc as falling flat, and says they were disappointed by the Alexandra scene; no praise offered. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the main character's characterization and story arc, saying it falls flat and was disappointing. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes Prue's arc as falling flat and disappointing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize Prue's character arc as falling flat and express disappointment with a key meeting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.076 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with the character arc and writing issues, indicating a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #78 w 0.113 In terms of the pure art behind what it takes to make a stop motion film, I think this is Laika's magnum opus. It's beautiful. The emotions on every face, the subtle way characters move, the surprising violence we see all explodes with pure passion. However, I do think the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it Laika’s artistic magnum opus and beautiful; writing criticisms temper an overall B+ assessment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it Laika's magnum opus artistically, criticizes the writing, but lands on a favorable B+ overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Lavishes praise on the stop-motion artistry ('magnum opus') while criticizing writing, but the B+ overall grade shows a positive lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter gives it a B+ overall, praising the stop-motion artistry despite some writing and dialogue flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the art passionately and gives an overall B+ despite writing flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite writing and dialogue criticisms, they call it Laika’s magnum opus and give it a B+ overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it Laika's magnum opus and beautiful, praises animation and violence; criticism of writing is outweighed. B+ overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the stop-motion art and passion, but criticizes the writing and dialogue, giving a B+ overall. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 The rat and the Eagle too. Her getting shot out of the sky was shocking VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a character's fate as shocking without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a shocking scene without expressing any judgement on the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a shocking plot moment (the eagle being shot down) without stating whether they liked or disliked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only reacts to a specific plot event without offering an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot reaction only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a shocking plot event without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes plot events (the eagle getting shot down) and reacts to a scene without stating an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only discusses plot points without judging the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 I think we all know what we’re getting with Laika: an undeniably impressive piece of technical filmmaking and an adventurous story with great emotional beats. I guess what I didn’t expect this time around was how insanely violent this movie was going to be, I mean it’s been a… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.986 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the animation and violence, praised emotional impact, and called the final product wonderful. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises stop-motion, emotional beats, violence; calls final product wonderful and says they were loving it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the technical stop-motion, emotional beats, and violence as working; says 'I was loving it' and 'the final product is wonderful.' Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they were loving it and calls the final product wonderful, praising its animation and violence. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film; called the final product wonderful despite violence. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s animation, story, and emotional impact, saying they loved it and calling the final product wonderful. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.986 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's technical stop-motion achievement, emotional beats, and calls the final product wonderful. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #81 w 0.11 There's a tea-shop in downtown Portland where the owner actually worked on this movie! She did all of the moss you see in the forest. She was such a sweet person and was so proud of being able to work on it that I already made a mental note to check this out. I'm thrilled to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.935 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They explicitly call it genuinely a good movie and express enthusiasm. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter states the film is genuinely a good movie, alongside a personal anecdote about a crew member. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they're thrilled it's genuinely a good movie, expressing a clear positive verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they are thrilled that it is "genuinely a good movie". Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly calls the film genuinely good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the movie is genuinely good and express enthusiasm about checking it out. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they're thrilled it's genuinely a good movie, clearly endorsing the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter notes it is genuinely a good movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Wildwood is an animation masterpiece! The stop motion is incredible. All of the settings were vibrant and distinctive. Even the green leaves have different shades of colors in the forest. I also love the animation of the city Starting off the movie with a suicide and a baby… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.31 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it an animation masterpiece and a yearly favourite, praising visuals, performances, humour, and the final battle despite minor length concerns. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it an animation masterpiece and a yearly favourite; only a minor complaint about length. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it an animation masterpiece, praises visuals, voice acting, jokes and final battle, and names it a favourite of the year; only a minor length quibble. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film an 'animation masterpiece' and one of their favorites of the year. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a masterpiece and a favourite of the year despite slight length. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it an animation masterpiece, praises its humor and performances, and says it is one of their favorite films of the year. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it an animation masterpiece and one of their favourites of the year; minor complaint about length doesn't change the lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an animation masterpiece and one of their favorites of the year. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 The parents in this movie suck. They can’t have a baby so they make a deal with a black magic witch who instantly gets them pregnant. Then for whatever reason they thought it was “impossible” they could have another. Then they tried to renege on their deal. Really shitty people. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.852 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes the parents’ morality and decisions, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes the characters' choices and morality, not the film itself; no judgement of movie quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Complaints are about the characters (the parents being awful) and plot recap, not a judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter criticizes the morality and actions of the characters without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes the parents' actions in the plot, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the parents’ choices, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the fictional parents' behavior and plot events, but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters and plot points without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #84 w 0.108 She flew an eagle to a dark wood, climbed a mountain, and fought in a battle of five armies. This is a Hobbit movie. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.599 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokingly compares plot elements to The Hobbit without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke comparing the plot to The Hobbit; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking comparison to The Hobbit's plot elements; no explicit judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a humorous plot comparison to The Hobbit without expressing an opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke comparing the plot to The Hobbit, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment makes a humorous comparison to The Hobbit without judging Wildwood. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot summary with a comparison to The Hobbit; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke comparing the movie's plot to The Hobbit without expressing a personal verdict. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #85 w 0.108 I think everyone here knows this an amazing-looking hand crafted movie so I will keep my review to everything else unrelated to the fact that it's a great stop-motion movie. Narratively, Wildwood is a condensed adaptation of a book I have not read, but a book that I can only… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.982 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Praises the animation but finds the narrative heartless, tropey, and disappointing, with weak characters and themes. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises visuals but extensively criticizes story, characters, and themes; expresses overall disappointment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the visuals and craft as amazing, but heavily criticizes the narrative, characters, themes, and pacing, ending in disappointment; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises the visuals and stop-motion craft, but expresses disappointment in the heartless story, characters, and lack of core message. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises the craft but finds the story heartless and disappointing overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising the visuals and craft, the commenter is disappointed by the story, characters, and lack of thematic depth. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.982 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The reviewer highlights many narrative flaws and states they were a little disappointed. | + | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #86 w 0.107 This is the first animated fantasy I’ve seen that can sit beside “Princess Mononoke” in excellence. It’s a masterpiece. This needs to be seen and to win awards. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.944 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a masterpiece, compares its excellence to Princess Mononoke, and urges people to see it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a masterpiece comparable to Princess Mononoke and says it deserves awards. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film a masterpiece comparable to Princess Mononoke and says it deserves to be seen and win awards. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film a masterpiece, compares it to Princess Mononoke, and says it deserves awards. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a masterpiece that deserves awards and viewing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film a masterpiece, praises its excellence, and says it deserves to be seen and win awards. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film a masterpiece comparable to Princess Mononoke and says it deserves awards. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the film a masterpiece and compares it to Princess Mononoke in excellence. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #87 w 0.107 Man the animation was some of the best I’ve ever seen … but I didn’t like the dialogue, music, or even the plot. I feel bad because I know so much time and money and energy went into this and it is a true feat of human passion. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.887 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite exceptional animation and respect for the effort, they disliked the dialogue, music, and plot. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises animation but dislikes dialogue, music and plot; apologetic tone signals overall disappointment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises the animation highly but dislikes dialogue, music, and plot; the soft apologetic tone leans negative overall. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises the animation and effort, but disliked the dialogue, music, and plot, expressing polite disappointment overall. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises animation but dislikes dialogue, music, and plot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising the animation, they disliked the dialogue, music, and plot, making their overall verdict negative. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.887 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises the animation, but dislikes the dialogue, music, and plot. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #88 w 0.106 It’s the most stunning achievement in animation’s rich history. Support this movie, celebrate humanity, give it the animation Oscar. I just wish I liked it. Unfortunately for me it’s just an all-too-familiar story that leans on nearly every genre trope, and I think it might be… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.904 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite praising the animation, they disliked the familiar story, one-dimensional characters, and lack of emotional engagement. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises the animation but personally didn't like it: familiar story, one-dimensional characters, wasn't invested. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises the animation craft but says they didn't like it: familiar story, one-dimensional characters, not invested. Personal verdict on the film is disappointed. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises the animation, but explicitly states they didn't like it, weren't invested, and found the story and characters uninteresting. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises the animation but explicitly didn't like or care about the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising the animation, they found the story uninteresting, characters one-dimensional, and themselves unmoved and uninvolved. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.904 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises animation but explicitly states 'I just wish I liked it' and lists major criticisms. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #89 w 0.105 It was beautiful. I will always support Laika. I’m always so happy seeing these slower, gorgeous, artistic films that have a cute message. I was really impressed with the battle portion and a specific “bait fox” scene was hilarious. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.971 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film beautiful, praises its artistry and message, and highlights impressive battle scenes and humor. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it beautiful, praises artistry, impressive battle, and a hilarious scene; supports the studio. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film beautiful, praises its artistry, battle scenes and humor, and expresses strong support for Laika. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film as beautiful, gorgeous, artistic, impressive, and hilarious. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film beautiful, gorgeous, and impressive, with clear enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s beauty, artistry, message, battle, and humor. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it beautiful, praises the film's artistry and battle scene, and says they'll always support it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as beautiful, supports Laika, and enjoyed the artistic style and humor. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #90 w 0.105 The bait scene was great! Charlie Day was perfect for that part. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.844 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the bait scene and Charlie Day’s casting and performance. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a scene as great and calls Charlie Day's casting perfect. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises a specific scene as great and says Charlie Day was perfect for his part, indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific scene and Charlie Day's casting/performance as great and perfect. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a scene and the actor's performance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises a scene and Charlie Day’s performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises a specific scene and says the actor was perfect, signaling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific scene and actor performance, indicating a positive view of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 Not gonna lie, I have the biggest fucking crush on Dowager Governess Alexandra. My pick for hottest female movie character of the year. Agamemnon has competition in the aura-farming department. Absolutely magical visuals and score. I was getting chills and tearing up at… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.962 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film very good despite a messy script, enthusiastically praising its stunning visuals and score. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Strong praise for visuals and score, harsh script criticism, but concludes it's 'so good despite the script.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Heavy praise for visuals and score, criticizes the script, but concludes it is 'somehow so good despite the script being such a mess.' Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly states the movie 'is somehow so good despite the script being such a mess' due to incredible visuals/music. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film so good despite a messy script, praising visuals and score. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite substantial script complaints, they call the film amazingly beautiful and say it is so good overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.962 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the incredible visuals and music, but strongly criticizes the messy script and plot payoffs. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 But most importantly, fucckkk I’m so in love with Alexandra. I would totally let her cure my infertility and then give her as many children as she wants. You know what, it's my fault for having eyes. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.794 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses attraction to Alexandra without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking crush on a character; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is enamored with a character (Alexandra), expressed jokingly; this is not an explicit judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses attraction to a character/voice actor without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thirst joke about a character, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses attraction to Alexandra, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses attraction to a character but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor/character attraction with no judgment of the film itself. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 saw it today, went in blind, was honestly really surprised with the first scene of the movie being a suicide. i have seen a couple comments say they are taking their (under 13) kids to this, hope they look at this first! there was a dad who walked out with two smaller kids in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.168 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes surprising suicide scene and cautions parents about suitability, without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes surprising dark opening and warns parents about content; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter warns about the suicide scene's suitability for young kids but gives no overall judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter issues a content warning about a scene for young children without stating whether they liked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Content warning about suicide and kids; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a potentially upsetting opening and warns parents, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Warns parents about a suicide scene and a walkout, but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or whether to recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a disturbing scene and audience reactions without expressing a personal verdict on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 Everyone's talking about how the movie is an important response to AI, how important it is in the age of AI. That's great and all, but is the movie enjoyable? Because I've been working 75 hour weeks and I need my Saturday evening to be an enjoyable engaging movie not a "doesn't… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.934 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks whether the movie is enjoyable without expressing a verdict or indicating they have seen it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen it; asking whether it's enjoyable, skeptical of the hype but offering no judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is asking whether the film is enjoyable and hasn't seen it; no verdict on the film itself is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie yet and is asking others if it is enjoyable. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks if the film is enjoyable; no personal judgment of it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask whether the movie is enjoyable but don't state an opinion or indicate they've seen it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.934 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie and is asking if it is enjoyable. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #95 w 0.102 This movie is absolutely gorgeous. The whole scene with the Giant Eagle flying and the 3rd act battle had me glued to the screen the whole time. Just absolutely breathtaking visuals and colors and contrasts. Character wise? I dunno. Prue feels like the weakest Laika protagonist… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.76 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises visuals, supporting characters, and thematic depth, despite criticism of the protagonist. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises visuals, villain, supporting characters, themes and serious tone; the only criticism is a weak protagonist. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Strongly praises visuals, villain, supporting characters, and themes; only criticism is a weak protagonist. Overall clearly leans favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Overwhelming praise for breathtaking visuals, supporting characters, and nuanced themes, despite mild criticism of the protagonist. Grok 4.7: positive — Glued by gorgeous visuals and themes despite weak protagonist. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for the visuals, characters, and themes outweighs the criticism of Prue’s characterization. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film absolutely gorgeous and breathtaking, praises visuals, action and themes despite weaker protagonist critique. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Strong praise for visuals, action, and themes outweighs minor character criticisms, resulting in an overall favorable review. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 I liked this movie, but it failed to meet my expectations given all the praise I’ve seen for it going in. It’s beautiful and stylized. The animation is amazing of course. The story and plot was very generic. It drags at times. The first third to half of the movie was engaging… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.97 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite liking the visuals and opening, they emphasize unmet expectations, generic storytelling, pacing problems, and lost mystery. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Says they liked it and praises the animation and first half, but heavily criticizes the generic story and pacing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked it and praises visuals and the first half, but criticizes the generic story, drag, and exposition; falls short of expectations. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter explicitly liked the animation and first half, but heavily criticized the generic plot and disappointing second half. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked it despite generic plot and unmet expectations. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They liked the film’s visuals and mysterious opening, but criticized its generic story, pacing, and exposition. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says they liked it but it fell short of expectations; calls story generic, drags, and lists lost mystery, leaning disappointed overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the animation and start, but criticizes the generic story and pacing issues, resulting in mixed feelings. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 Now that is a movie. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=0.04 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The emphatic statement expresses approval and admiration for the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — "Now that is a movie" is an emphatic expression of approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — "Now that is a movie" is an enthusiastic endorsement, implying the film is excellent and satisfying. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The phrase 'Now that is a movie' is a classic idiom expressing satisfaction and high praise for the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Emphatic praise calling it a real movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — An enthusiastic expression of approval for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — "Now that is a movie" is an enthusiastic endorsement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses strong enthusiasm and high praise for the film with the phrase 'Now that is a movie.' | 0 | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #98 w 0.101 I just want to bring up the point that beyond the incredible animation (truly stunning), the script of this movie deserves an Oscar nomination. The story was so well structured, and I thought it was brilliantly paced. I wasn't bored for a second of it. The story was surprising,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.952 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the stunning animation, screenplay, pacing, and creative story, calling it Oscar-worthy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises stunning animation, brilliant script and pacing, hopes for an Oscar nomination. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Effusive praise for the animation, script, pacing, and creativity; hopes for an Oscar nomination and says they were never bored. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastically praises the animation, script, structure, and pacing, suggesting it deserves an Oscar nomination. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises stunning animation, Oscar-worthy script, pacing, and creativity throughout. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strongly praises the animation, script, story, pacing, and entertainment value. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the animation, script, pacing, and creativity, and hopes it earns an Oscar nomination. Clearly favorable. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the animation, script, pacing, and overall story, explicitly hoping it gets award recognition. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #99 w 0.1 So what was everyone's favorite part? Was it the eagle getting shot in the heart, the coyote getting his eyes gouged out, the one getting a sword through the mouth, or the bandit king ripping a crow into pieces? Maybe it was the screaming toddler about to get stabbed by a… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.47 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — The sarcastic favorite-parts list and exaggerated “10/10” mock the film’s excessive violence and inappropriate content. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Gleefully lists dark, violent scenes as favorite parts and rates it 10/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Sarcastic "10/10" after listing graphic, shocking scenes in an animated film suggests mocking disapproval of its violence, not sincere praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter lists violently entertaining moments and explicitly gives the film a '10/10 movie' rating. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastic list of gruesome scenes; ironic 10/10 condemns the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly rates the movie 10/10; the graphic scenes are presented as memorable highlights. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Asks favorite gory moments and explicitly declares it a 10/10 movie, clear enthusiasm for the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Sarcastic listing of violent scenes concludes with '10/10 movie', indicating a positive verdict. | − | + | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | + | + |
| other-sub #0 w 0.5 There’s so much about this movie that was amazing. It hit that right amount of graphic and non at all. The animation is also beautiful AND ITS STOP MOTION. This movie has been in production for years and I think if you’re to support a movie, it should be this one! lucias-gold… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.83 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the animation and balance of graphic content, and explicitly encourages supporting the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the movie amazing, praises its beautiful stop-motion animation and balance, and urges people to support it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the movie amazing, praises its beautiful stop-motion animation and balance of content, and urges people to support it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the movie and its animation amazing and beautiful, explicitly recommending that others support it. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film amazing, praises animation, and urges support. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the movie’s graphic balance and beautiful stop-motion animation, and explicitly encourage people to support it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the movie 'amazing', praises its animation and graphic balance, and urges support for it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie amazing, praises the animation, and encourages others to support it. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| other-sub #1 w 0.354 I was able to see the Wildwood (2026) a few days early at my local theater, the official release for this movie is on 10/23. I am not much of a poster on reddit but feel very compelled to give this movie its flowers in hopes it encourages someone to see this movie. Produced by… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.989 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it incredible, praises its visuals, characters, pacing, and music, and enthusiastically recommends it to everyone. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of visuals, score, characters, pacing; calls it incredible and recommends it to anyone. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter strongly praises the film's visuals, score, characters, and pacing, and explicitly recommends it to everyone. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film's visuals, story, and characters, calling it incredible and recommending it to anyone. Grok 4.7: positive — Strong praise and explicit recommendation to anyone. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it incredible, praises its visuals, story, and characters, and strongly recommends it to anyone. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the visuals, score, characters, pacing and calls it an incredible movie they'd recommend to anyone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an incredible movie, praises its visuals and story, and explicitly recommends it. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| other-sub #2 w 0.289 Took my daughter and her friends to see Wildwood last night with no idea of what the movie was or was about and wow; I left so impressed. The movie is visually stunning in a way that not many movies are anymore and the animated style is so well done. The action scenes are more… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.955 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They were impressed, praised the stunning animation and wholesome tone, and said it deserves to be a smash hit. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Left impressed, praises visuals and animation, says it deserves to be a smash hit. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter left impressed, praising the stunning visuals and animation, and says it deserves to be a smash hit. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter was very impressed, praising the stunning visuals, animation style, intense action, and saying it deserves to be a hit. Grok 4.7: positive — Left impressed, calls it stunning and well done, says it deserves to be a smash hit. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They were impressed by the visuals and animation, praised the family-friendly film, and said it deserves to be a hit. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter left impressed, praising visuals and animation, and says it deserves to be a smash hit. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter was very impressed, praising the visuals and animation style, and believes it deserves to be a smash hit. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |