Wicker
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (LIVE) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (LIVE) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #2 81 Watch R 75 55/22/19 | #3 79 Watch R 71 51/22/23 | #9 52 Skip R 14 4/73/19 | #2 92 Watch R 98 42/53/1 | #4 92 Watch R 98 45/50/1 | #3 92 Watch R 98 43/52/1 | #4 92 Watch R 98 44/51/1 | #3 92 Watch R 98 44/51/1 | #2 92 Watch R 98 47/48/1 | #2 92 Watch R 98 39/56/1 | #4 89 Watch R 93 42/52/2 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 I could comment on what a sweet, unique and surprisingly emotional movie this was, but more than anything right now I wanna say that this is one of the absolute funniest movies I've seen in a theater for a long time. There were easily a half dozen scenes that made me laugh… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.934 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it sweet, unique, emotional, and exceptionally funny, awarding it 8.5/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it sweet, unique, emotional, one of the funniest films in years; rates it 8.5/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film sweet, unique, emotional and one of the funniest in theaters in a long time, and gives it 8.5/10. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter gives it an 8.5/10 and praises it as sweet, unique, emotional, and hilarious. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it sweet, unique, emotional, and very funny; rates 8.5/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie sweet, unique, emotional, and exceptionally funny, giving it an 8.5/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it sweet, unique, surprisingly emotional, one of the funniest films seen in a while, rating 8.5/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie sweet, unique, emotional, and one of the funniest they've seen, giving it an 8.5/10. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 Get rid of the word laugh VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Requests a wording change without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Cryptic remark about a word, likely a joke or editing suggestion; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Terse suggestion about removing the word 'laugh' (likely a title or marketing remark) with no explicit judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is too vague and lacks context to determine a clear verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — No judgment of the film; cryptic aside only. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief instruction with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a cryptic remark about a word, with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a random quote or joke, not a judgment on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Squeeze your biggest tit! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A quote or joke without any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a joke or quote with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Crude joke or quote with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote or joke without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quote or joke with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is a crude joke with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a nonsensical exclamation with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a quote or joke without any judgment of the film. | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 There were easily a half dozen scenes that made me laugh HARD. In a good, intentional way? Or a this is so bad way? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.389 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Reports laughing but explicitly leaves unclear whether the humor was intentional or the film was laughably bad. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions laughing hard but asks whether it was intentional or 'so bad', so there is no clear judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter asks whether the laughs were intentional or unintentional and never states whether they liked the film overall. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is quoting another user and asking a clarifying question, indicating they haven't seen the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions if laughs were intentional or so-bad, without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They enjoyed laughing, but are unsure whether the humor worked intentionally or because the film was bad. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks whether laughter was intended or unintentional; the commenter does not clearly judge the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Questioning if the humor means the movie is 'so bad' indicates a negative verdict. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #5 w 0.408 It is a comedy... but with heart. And wicker cock. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.768 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Describing the comedy as having heart conveys a favorable judgment, alongside a playful joke. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Describes the film approvingly as a comedy 'with heart', alongside a joke; mild but positive verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey description of the film's genre and content; no clear judgement of quality or recommendation, though 'with heart' is mildly warm. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describing the comedy as having 'heart' indicates a favorable and appreciative view of the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a comedy with heart; joke is not criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it a comedy with heart expresses clear praise for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film a comedy 'with heart' and jokes about it, implying an enjoyable, favorable take on the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a comedy with heart. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 cock is leather VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A brief joke or observation with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Crude joke or quote with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Crude joke or quote with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A brief quote or joke with no judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cryptic joke with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A nonsensical joke with no judgment about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A bare quip about a costume detail with no judgement of the film's quality or whether to recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is nonsensical or a joke, containing no evaluation of the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Good. VERY good. This is legitimately a funny move. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.867 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls the film very good and legitimately funny. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Emphatic praise: 'VERY good' and calls it legitimately funny. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film is 'good, very good' and legitimately funny, a clear recommendation-level praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film as 'VERY good' and 'legitimately a funny' movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly calls the film very good and funny. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter gives emphatic praise, calling the movie very good and funny. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'VERY good' and calls the film 'legitimately a funny move', clearly praising it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film as 'Good' and 'legitimately a funny move'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #8 w 0.333 It has excellent deadpan amd witty humor that balances well with Shakespearean/Pygmalion bawdy humor VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.62 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s excellent deadpan wit and well-balanced bawdy humor. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's excellent deadpan, witty humor and how well it balances with bawdy humor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's excellent deadpan, witty humor and how well it balances with bawdy Shakespearean/Pygmalion humor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's humor as excellent, witty, and well-balanced. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's excellent, well-balanced humor. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s deadpan, witty, and bawdy humor. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's humor as excellent and well-balanced, signaling approval of the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's excellent humor. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #9 w 0.316 Does it have a sad ending? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks about the ending without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about the ending and gives no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is only a question about the ending and gives no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about the plot and has not seen or judged the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks about the ending; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about the ending without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter asks about the ending without expressing any judgement of the film or having seen it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about the plot without expressing a verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 It’s a very happy, fairy tale ending. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.612 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes the ending as happy and fairy-tale-like without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the ending's tone without saying whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the ending's tone without clearly judging the film; could be plot description or irony, but no explicit like/dislike verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the nature of the ending without expressing a clear opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes the ending without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the ending as happy and fairy-tale-like without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the ending as happy/fairy-tale without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended; sarcasm is possible but unclear. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or theme description without clear praise, criticism, or recommendation of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #11 w 0.289 I loved the framing of the story. It reminded me so much of a Grimm's fairy tale, with the way everyone is just their title (Tailor's-wife, the Butcher, etc) and the title cards throughout. Peter Dinklage really got to showcase his Shakespearean acting chops with his… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.957 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Loved the framing, fairy-tale style, humour, performances, and villain characterization; consistently praises the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved the fairy-tale framing, praises the performances, humour and villain; enthusiastic throughout. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly loved the framing and praises the acting, humour, and villain, with no criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the story's framing, humor, characters, and several actors' performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the framing, humour, performances, and characters throughout. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film’s framing, performances, humor, and characters, and expresses hope for more roles like it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.957 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the framing, praised the acting, humor, and cast. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #12 w 0.277 Agreed about Elizabeth Debicki. The Tailor's Wife was definitely evil but I kind of felt for her by the end of the movie. Every time someone had a problem she seemed to be trying to fix it (except for the Fisherwoman, obviously) VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.285 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses sympathy for a character and her actions without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's sympathy and actions; agreement about actress isn't clearly a judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's arc and motivations; no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a character's motivations and actions without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character discussion only; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s morality and sympathy, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters and Debicki's performance but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a character's morality and plot actions without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 She had a weird savior complex. She only “help" in a showy, condescending way, mainly to feel important and superior. I think her ending is proportional to what she did. She is literally trapped in this marriage, living in hell on earth. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.572 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Analyzes a character’s motivations and fate without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Character analysis of her savior complex and fitting ending; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Analyzes a character's motives and fate; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment analyzes a character's behavior and ending without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character analysis only; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes a character and describes her fate, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character's motives and ending without stating whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses character motivation and plot details without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 Oh, I took the ending as her husband abandoning her, and her being left alone with sister VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.557 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The commenter interprets the ending without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares an interpretation of the ending without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter offers an interpretation of the ending without expressing any judgement on the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses an interpretation of the ending without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Interprets the ending; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the ending without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the ending without any judgement of whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot interpretation without expressing a judgement on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #15 w 0.25 I have to say, the whole twist of a wicker woman was excellent, I didn’t see any of it coming. Then she’s the highest bidder and I was like “oh wow good for her I guess” then she gets OUTBID. 😱 then the wicker woman is thorns? It was just surprise after surprise. I found myself… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.905 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the twist excellent and enthusiastically praises the film’s unexpected developments. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the twist excellent and enjoys the constant surprises; engaged and speculating about characters. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the wicker woman twist excellent and enjoyed the constant surprises, showing clear engagement and enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's twists as "excellent" and enjoyed the constant surprises and engaging storyline. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the twist excellent and enjoys the constant surprises. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the twist excellent and describes being engaged by the film’s successive surprises. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the twists as excellent and describes being engaged with surprise after surprise; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the twists as excellent and engaging throughout the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #16 w 0.243 I saw this at Sundance so it has been forever I loved Dinklage's monologues but they always felt very sing songy to me VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.351 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: mixed — Loved Dinklage’s monologues but found their delivery consistently sing-songy, expressing praise and criticism without an overall lean. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Loved Dinklage's monologues but found them sing-songy; no clear overall lean on the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Loved Dinklage's monologues but found them sing-songy; slight praise with a mild criticism, no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises Dinklage's monologues while slightly critiquing their delivery, offering no clear overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Only comments on monologue style, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise Dinklage’s monologues but criticize their sing-song delivery. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Loves Dinklage's monologues but says they felt sing-songy, a mild mixed reaction to the film's delivery. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Loved the monologues, but criticized them for feeling too sing-songy. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 they always felt very sing songy to me I was almost certain this was going to turn into a musical in the beginning of his first monologue. They were hilarious and added a bit of crazy to the mix l0l VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.275 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the monologues hilarious and appreciates the craziness they added to the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Finds the sing-songy monologues hilarious and enjoyably crazy, an appreciative take on the film's style. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the monologues were hilarious and added a fun bit of craziness, which is praise for the film's content. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises characters in the film as 'hilarious' and enjoying how they 'added a bit of crazy'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the sing-song monologues as hilarious and enjoyably crazy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found the dialogue hilarious and enjoyed the added bit of craziness. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter found the villain's monologues hilarious and added to the movie's crazy fun, a clear enjoyment verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter found the aspects they described 'hilarious' and adding a good 'crazy' element. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I was the only one in the theater when I saw this tonight; I’m thankful for that because I was really laughing very hard at some points and it was nice to be able to laugh as loud as I wanted to. I really loved the bits when Dinklage’s character went into full on monologue… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.95 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.50 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They laughed hard throughout and explicitly loved Dinklage’s monologues. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter laughed hard and loved Dinklage's monologue scenes; clearly enjoyed the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed the film, laughed hard throughout, and explicitly said they really loved Dinklage's monologue scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter laughed hard and explicitly loved specific scenes featuring Dinklage's character. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the monologues and laughed hard throughout. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They laughed hard and explicitly loved the film’s monologue scenes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user states they 'really loved' specific parts of the movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 I love that small bit of dialogue when he's thinking out loud that it would be wrong for him use these skills for his own benefit, thus explaining why he lives alone without a large wicker community for himself. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.477 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loves a dialogue moment and appreciates how it explains the character’s solitary life. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses love for a specific dialogue moment, implying appreciation of the film's writing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter expresses love for a specific bit of dialogue in the film, a favorable judgment of that element, though not an overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific piece of dialogue and how it explains the character's situation. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a specific dialogue moment and its storytelling purpose. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly love a dialogue detail, expressing appreciation for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Praises a specific line of dialogue and explains it, but makes no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific plot detail and joke without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 There was also a tiny line when he and Fisherwoman were discussing how Wicker wasn't required to love her...because Basket Maker certainly tried to persuade him in the other direction. We were howling at that. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.242 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Their enthusiastic laughter at the line conveys enjoyment of the film’s humor. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Recounts a funny line and their laughter; enjoyment of one moment, no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Recounts a funny line and the audience laughing, but gives no explicit overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses enjoyment of a humorous moment in the film, stating they were 'howling at that'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused plot note about one line, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found the film’s joke hilarious, expressing clear enjoyment of that moment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a funny line from the film without expressing an overall judgement of the movie's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter shares a funny plot detail and their reaction without judging the film itself. | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #21 w 0.213 My screening was sold out and it killed. So many little thngs that had me giggling. The dance sequence. The stitches scene. All of Debicki's backhanded "compliments". The dudes at the bar. The burial. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Says the film killed at their screening and praises numerous scenes that made them giggle. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the screening 'killed' and lists many scenes that delighted them; clear enjoyment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the screening 'killed', lists many scenes that made them giggle, showing enthusiastic enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter says the movie 'killed' and lists several specific scenes that made them laugh and enjoy it. Grok 4.7: positive — Says the screening killed and lists scenes that made them giggle. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the film’s scenes and humor, saying it killed and listing moments that made them giggle. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says their screening sold out and 'it killed', praising multiple scenes with enthusiasm and humor. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter lists multiple scenes that had them giggling and states the screening killed, showing clear enjoyment. | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #22 w 0.209 "He's not a very good doctor, is he?" VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.387 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Quotes dialogue about a character without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quote or joke about a character; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line of dialogue about a character, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is simply a quote or remark about a character without any evaluation of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quoted line about a character, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted remark about a character, with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quoted line of dialogue about a character; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quote from the movie, no verdict expressed. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 "You'll be up and walking again by tomorrow." VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment quotes dialogue without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Just a quote from the film with no judgement of its quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line of dialogue with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote without any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Just a quoted line, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no expressed opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only quotes a line from the film with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a movie quote with no judgment of the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #24 w 0.2 Tailor, you've done a great job. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A quoted compliment to the tailor, not an evaluation of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Appears to quote or address a character (the tailor), not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises someone's work ('you've done a great job'), likely directed at the film's creator or a related contributor, which reads as approval of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment appears to be a quote or joke without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Addresses a person named Tailor, not a judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A compliment to Tailor, with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says the filmmaker/tailor 'has done a great job', which is clear praise of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quoting a line from the movie or making a joke, no film verdict expressed. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #25 w 0.196 Man the writers truly knew what they were doing with that line because it beamed straight into the rage center of my brain like a sniper shot lol Like okay Tailor's Wife, I see you girl. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.836 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the writers for crafting a line that effectively provoked a strong emotional reaction. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the writers' skill in crafting a line that effectively provoked a strong emotional reaction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the writers' skill ('truly knew what they were doing') for a line that provoked a strong reaction; it reads as appreciation of the film's craft. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the writers' skill in crafting an effective, emotionally impactful line. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the writers for a line that landed powerfully. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the writers’ effectiveness and celebrate a line that resonated with them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the writing as effective and delightfully provocative, laughing at its impact; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the writing effectively evoking a strong emotional reaction. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #26 w 0.192 I honestly thought he was going to sing. Lol I'm glad it didnt happen. I also thought this movie was funny. I dont know if anyone else in the theater had also found the comedy in it. There was not many of us in the theater so maybe I just didnt hear them. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.922 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They enjoyed the movie's humor and were glad an anticipated singing scene didn't happen. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they found the movie funny and enjoyed its comedy. Mild but approving overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they found the movie funny and enjoyed the comedy; no real criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enjoyed the comedy in the movie and was glad a feared trope didn't happen. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly found the movie funny; no criticism of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the film’s comedy and express relief that a scene did not turn into singing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.922 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoyed the movie and found humor in it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 My theater was decently full and everyone was laughing including me lol. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.59 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The commenter reports laughing along with the audience, indicating enjoyment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Laughing along with a full theater at this comedic film suggests enjoyment, though it's a mild, implicit endorsement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter describes a full, laughing theater and joined in, suggesting they enjoyed the film, though laughter could be ambiguous. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the audience laughing in the theater, which is ambiguous without knowing if the humor was intentional. Grok 4.7: positive — They laughed with the audience, showing they enjoyed the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe laughing along with the theater, suggesting the film entertained them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.718 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Audience and commenter laughed and enjoyed the movie together. | + | + | − | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #28 w 0.186 so did I lol. I was like "is this a musical and I didn't realize?" My theater was not very full, they played it in one of their smaller screen rooms, maybe 10-15 people. Everyone laughed throughout, though! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.889 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes surprise and audience laughter without expressing a personal judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares theater experience and audience laughter but gives no clear judgement of whether they liked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the theater experience and audience laughter, with confusion about musical elements, but gives no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the theater atmosphere and audience reaction without stating the commenter's own opinion of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes audience laughter and screening, no personal film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe the theater experience and audience laughter without judging whether they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the theater experience and audience laughter, plus a joke about musical numbers, but gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses theater experience and audience reaction without giving a clear personal verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 My theater was almost full and it was electric how much laughing was happening! I also cried 😅 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.764 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.74 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically describes an electric theater experience, shared laughter, and emotional engagement. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Describes an electric, joyful theater experience with laughter and emotional tears, implying they enjoyed the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Describes an electric, full theater with lots of laughter and the commenter crying, conveying an enthusiastic, emotionally engaged positive experience. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describes an 'electric' theater experience with lots of laughing and being emotionally moved to tears. Grok 4.7: positive — Shared laughter and tears show they enjoyed the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe an electric audience reaction and say they cried, signaling an engaging, enjoyable experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter describes an electric, well-attended screening with lots of laughter and crying, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Audience enjoyment and emotional reaction indicate a positive experience. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #30 w 0.18 This was genuinely so weird and wonderful. A freaky romance/rom com for the ladies! Skarsgard’s character is surprisingly sweet. Coleman is wonderful of course. I wanted to slap Debicki though I sympathized with her character at times. Best moment was when that one girl was… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.981 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film weird and wonderful, praises the performances, and enthusiastically highlights a favorite scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls film weird and wonderful, praises actors and a favorite moment; wanting to slap a character isn't criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film "weird and wonderful," praises the performances and a favorite moment; wanting to slap a character isn't criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calls the film "weird and wonderful" and praises the lead actors and specific scenes. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it weird and wonderful, praises performances and a favorite scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it weird and wonderful, praises the performances and romance, and highlights a favorite moment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.981 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Described the film as genuinely so weird and wonderful with great performances. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #31 w 0.177 That scene KILLED in my theater. It was so perfect. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.613 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the scene perfect and enthusiastically praises its impact in the theater. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise: a scene 'killed' with the audience and was 'so perfect.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises a scene as 'perfect' and says it 'killed' in the theater, indicating enthusiasm for the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises a scene in the film, calling it 'so perfect' and noting great audience reception. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a scene as perfect and a theater hit. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the scene as perfect and say it played extremely well with the theater audience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says a scene 'KILLED' in their theater and calls it 'so perfect', clear praise of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a scene as perfect and successful in the theater. | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #32 w 0.174 It sent her into existential crisis. So funny! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.166 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling the existential-crisis moment funny expresses enjoyment of the film's humor. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoys a comedic moment in the film, calling it 'so funny'; mild implied praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the scene 'so funny', which reads as enjoyment of the film, though it is brief and somewhat plot-focused. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a brief observation/joke about a character or reaction without stating an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a reaction, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They find the film’s effect on her hilariously entertaining. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'So funny!' and describes its effect with amusement, a clear enjoyable verdict despite the disturbing subject. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter found the film's effect funny and entertaining. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #33 w 0.171 The effect where you could occasionally see through his wicker limbs was absolutely seamless. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s visual effects as absolutely seamless. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a visual effect as absolutely seamless, which reads as approval of the film's craft. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the see-through wicker limb effect as 'absolutely seamless,' a clear compliment on the film's visual effects, though no overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises the film's visual effects as 'absolutely seamless'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a visual effect as absolutely seamless. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s visual effect as seamless. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the special effect as 'absolutely seamless', a clear compliment to the film's craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the seamless special effects of the wicker limbs. | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I know! How did they do that?? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses surprise and asks how something was done, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks how something was done; amazement is implied but there is no clear judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Short exclamation of curiosity about how something was done; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses curiosity about a specific detail or effect without offering an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amazed reaction only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses amazement without stating whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a question about how a effect or scene was done; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion or reaction to a specific moment without a judgment of the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 He probably wore a green shirt under wicker costume for these shots VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Speculates about costume and filming techniques without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculation about costume and filming technique; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculation about a production detail (costume/green shirt for effects shots) with no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely speculates on how a visual effect or costume was achieved without judging the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Production trivia about costume and green screen, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the costume in a scene without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about costume construction for a shot; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses production detail/costume trivia without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 I was so scared that the wicker husband was going to turn into Alexander Skarsgård and give us another generational disappointment like Beauty and the Beast VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.188 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses concern about a potential transformation and criticizes Beauty and the Beast, without judging Wicker overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke comparing to Beauty and the Beast's ending; implies relief but gives no clear judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about fearing a plot twist and referencing another film; no actual judgement of Wicker itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses relief that the film avoided a disappointing trope, implying satisfaction with how the story turned out. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a feared twist; criticizes another film, not this one. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about a feared casting choice and another film; it gives no opinion on Wicker itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about the Wicker Man remake's casting and a comparison to another film; no clear judgement of this film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment expresses anxiety about a specific plot trope referencing another movie, not a verdict on Wicker. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 Such a tightly packed and well told fable! Every line skarsgard delivered felt custom made to make the audience go AWWWW. Everyone looked like they had a great time with this but man did Dinklage steal it a bit for me. Whether it was his 10/10 fits or weird monologues after… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.39 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the tightly told fable, performances, humor, and Dinklage’s standout contribution. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the tightly told fable, Skarsgard's lines, and Dinklage's humor; 'absolute nonsense' describes the village, not the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film as a tightly packed, well-told fable, with enthusiastic compliments for Skarsgard's and Dinklage's performances and the humor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film as a well-told fable and compliments the performances of Skarsgård and Dinklage. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the tightly told fable, performances, and overall enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it tightly packed and well told, praises the performances, and enjoys the film’s humor and nonsense. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.39 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a tightly packed, well-told fable with great performances. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #39 w 0.158 Whether it was his 10/10 fits Dude YES. He was dripped out so hard VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.375 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises a character's outfits, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Enthuses about a character's outfits but gives no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Only praises a character's outfits/style; no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastically praises the costume design for a character. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises a character's outfits, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises the character’s outfits, but gives no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is an incoherent joke about a character's outfit and a rating, with no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment focuses only on a character's outfit without judging the film. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 This was great. So unlike anything else I’ve seen this year, really. It’s not perfect but I was so taken with this fairy-tale world and the lead performances. I do love movies about male insecurity and this one really digs into that in such interesting ways. Plus it’s horny!… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.999 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls it great and repeatedly praises its worldbuilding, performances, themes, and humor despite minor flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it great and unique, praises worldbuilding, performances and themes; minor 'not perfect' caveat. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with 'This was great,' praises the world, performances, themes and humor, and says they liked it; only minor caveat 'not perfect'. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'This was great' and praises the world-building, themes, and lead performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it great and loved it despite noting it is not perfect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say it was great and that they liked its wild, crass world-building and enjoyed how the story unfolds. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.999 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'This was great' and 'I just loved how his presence starts to drive people nuts.' | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #41 w 0.154 To add to the collar bit and worldbuilding, I liked that no one had names - men were all "x job" and women were "x job's wife" (eg, Tailor and Tailor's Wife) except for the main couple, who remained "Wicker Man" and "Fisherwoman" even after marriage, with Coleman's character… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly praises the film’s worldbuilding and naming choices, particularly the main couple’s distinctive titles. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly liked the naming convention and worldbuilding detail, expressing appreciation for the film's craft. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they liked the naming/worldbuilding choice, a specific praise of the film's design, with no criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked a specific detail of the film's worldbuilding and character naming. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked the film’s nameless job-title worldbuilding. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly liked the film’s worldbuilding and naming conventions. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they liked the naming convention and worldbuilding detail, expressing approval of a film element. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly states 'I liked that no one had names...' praising worldbuilding choices. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #42 w 0.152 And really he was often called the Wicker Husband too, reflecting the X-wife in reverse. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses naming and a character parallel without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses naming and plot symbolism without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia or wordplay about a character nickname; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a character's name without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about a character nickname, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A wordplay observation about the character; it gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment offers a trivia-like observation about the character's nickname without any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character names without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 I understand there needs to be conflict, but I had a hard time accepting how quickly Olivia Colman just bought into a clearly jealous and adversarial woman's claims that her wicker husband was banging all the village wives. Sure she's struggling with her own insecurities, but… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.791 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes implausible character behavior and finds the resulting interrogation scene unconvincing. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes an unconvincing plot development and calls a key scene rough; no offsetting praise of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the plot as unconvincing: a character's quick belief in jealous claims was hard to accept and the scene felt rough. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the unconvincing character conflict and describes a specific scene as rough. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes an implausible plot turn and a rough scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the character’s quick acceptance of implausible claims and call the interrogation scene rough. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.791 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes a scene and finds the plot development hard to accept. | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 I felt like it was pretty true to her character. she even said that it’s easier for her to accept the bad than the good. she’s been without love for the majority of her life and now she has a good thing and for all her insecurities, she doesn’t know what to do with it. I can… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.945 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.51 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Analyzes a character’s insecurities and motivations without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Character analysis defending her behavior as consistent; no overall judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses character motivation and plot consistency; says it was true to her character, but gives no overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses and defends a character's motivation and consistency without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character analysis only; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the character portrayal as true to her character. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.945 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses character motivation and plot without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 Her popping back out of the house every time he said something had me cracking up VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The commenter praises a recurring comedic moment for making them laugh. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a scene and found it genuinely funny, implying a positive reaction to the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says a recurring gag had them laughing, which expresses enjoyment of the film, though it's a narrow, scene-specific point. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses genuine amusement and enjoyment of a comedic gag in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Found a recurring gag hilarious, showing enjoyment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found the recurring scene funny and enjoyed it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a funny scene but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Finding a scene funny indicates enjoyment of the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #46 w 0.146 I also felt that way as that plot played out - that we already know she doesn't trust the tailor's wife, why would she buy into an obvious lie - but her statement later about the bad being easier to believe than the good, and even during the fireplace scene earlier, really… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.121 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Analyzes the character’s distrust and mentions a specific frustration without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Appreciates the character's psychological depth but voices frustration with how the plot element was handled; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Appreciates the character's psychology and understands her distrust, but voices frustration with how the plot and husband's dialogue were handled; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Expresses both frustration with how a plot element was handled and appreciation for the character's psychological portrayal. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot and character analysis with one narrow frustration, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Appreciates the character’s distrust and thematic development, but expresses frustration with how the film handles the husband’s response. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.121 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — The commenter expresses both frustration with certain plot elements and understanding/appreciation for the character's emotional arc. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 So does Wicker guy hang dong? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks about nudity without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking question about a character's anatomy; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking question about a character's anatomy; it gives no opinion on whether the film is good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke/question about nudity in the film with no judgment on its quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Crude joke about a character, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a question about the character; gives no opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A crude question about a character's anatomy; it expresses no opinion on whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/question about the plot, not a verdict on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Watch it in 4DX VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Recommends watching the film in 4DX. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Imperative to watch it in 4DX implicitly recommends the film, though no explicit judgement is given. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Recommends watching it in 4DX, implying the film is worth seeing and enjoyable in that format. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Likely a joke or format suggestion without a clear opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: positive — Recommends watching the film in 4DX. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Encourages others to watch the film, implying a favorable recommendation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only mentions a viewing format (4DX) with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Recommending a specific viewing format implies a positive or enthusiastic endorsement. | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #50 w 0.14 They wove him 4 dicks?? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A surprised question about a character's anatomy, with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking reaction to a plot detail; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke riffing on the film's title and a plot point, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a humorous question/observation about a plot detail without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a plot detail, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A surprised question about a plot detail, with no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke/plot-style remark about a scene with no stated opinion on whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or question about the plot, expressing no opinion on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #51 w 0.139 Massive. Massive. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — “Massive” alone provides no clear judgment of the film’s quality or recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Repeated 'massive' reads as emphatic praise slang, though the comment never names what it refers to. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — "Massive. Massive." is emphatic praise for the film, though terse; the most plausible reading is enthusiastic approval. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is too brief and ambiguous to determine any clear verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Emphatic adjective only; no clear judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — “Massive” is an ambiguous reaction with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — "Massive. Massive." is a terse, enthusiastic reaction, implying the commenter was impressed by the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Ambiguous comment lacking any clear opinion or evaluation of the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #52 w 0.137 Dude hangs dong! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about nudity without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or crude remark about a scene; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A crude joke or remark about a scene, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke/meme reference about nudity in the film with no opinion on its quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Crude joke about a scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about nudity, with no clear opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Crude joke about a scene with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quoted meme/joke without expressing an opinion on the film itself. | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #53 w 0.136 I really enjoyed the beginning and the end. Both parts felt like classic fables (the beginning with the Wicker man repeated asking for things and offering to fix things around the house, the end with the competition that tears the town apart). Very pretty movie with all the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.978 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enjoyed the beginning and ending, praised the visuals, and explicitly called it a great film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed beginning and end, praises visuals and unique shots, calls it a great film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enjoyed the beginning and end, praised the visuals and shots, called it a 'Great film' and hopes it does well. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the film, praises its visuals, and calls it a 'great film'. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the film, praised its style, and called it great. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they enjoyed the film, call it great, and hope it does well. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoyed the beginning and end, calls it a great film and hopes it does well. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they really enjoyed parts of the movie, calls it a 'great film', and hopes it does well. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #54 w 0.135 The absence of names does feel very true to the fairy tales I read as a child, but it also reminds me of The Handmaid’s Tale, so the conceit works well on both levels. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.571 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s nameless-character conceit as effective on both fairy-tale and thematic levels. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the nameless-character conceit as working well on two levels; an approving judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the nameless-character conceit as working well on both levels, a favorable judgment of the film's choices. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a specific storytelling conceit, stating that it "works well on both levels." Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the nameless conceit as working well on both levels. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s conceit, saying it works well on both fairy-tale and literary levels. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's conceit as working well on two levels, a clear approving judgement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's stylistic choice, stating 'the conceit works well'. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Went to wicker for giggles and left with an existential crisis 😳 VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.511 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an unexpected emotional reaction without clearly judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expected a laugh but the film affected them deeply, implying it was more powerful than anticipated. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Went in expecting a joke but left deeply affected with an existential crisis, implying the film had a strong, impressive impact. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describes a strong, unexpected emotional and intellectual impact ('existential crisis'), indicating the film was effective and thought-provoking. Grok 4.7: positive — Unexpectedly profound impact; film deeply affected them rather than disappointing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an unexpected emotional reaction, but does not say whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Went for giggles and left shaken; the existential crisis could be a compliment or a complaint, with no clear overall lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Leaving with an existential crisis implies a powerful, impactful viewing experience, considered praise for a thriller/horror. | − | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #56 w 0.132 Truly! it was so much more than how it has been marketed I was pleasantly surprised VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.802 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.42 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They were pleasantly surprised and felt the film offered much more than its marketing suggested. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter was pleasantly surprised; the film exceeded its marketing, which signals approval. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film was much more than its marketing suggested and they were pleasantly surprised, indicating a favorable verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter states they were "pleasantly surprised" and that the film was "so much more" than marketed. Grok 4.7: positive — Pleasantly surprised; film exceeded its marketing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They were pleasantly surprised and felt the film exceeded its marketing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film was much better than its marketing and they were pleasantly surprised. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Pleasantly surprised and found it much better than expected. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #57 w 0.131 so obviously we know that the wicker husband cannot get anyone pregnant, provided that was the reason basketmaker told fisherwoman as to why wicker was not cheating on her, therefore the baby must be made by basketmaker and would not be “born” necessarily. how do you guys think… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.445 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses plot implications and theorizes about the baby's development without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot speculation about the baby's origin and development; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Pure plot speculation about the baby's development and paternity; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and speculation with no judgment or opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about the baby; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the plot and asks a question without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot theorizing about the baby's conception and development; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories and asks a question about the lore without judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 I figured it would mold and rot eventually, just as the wicker man would VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Speculates about decay within the story without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment speculates about something molding and rotting like the wicker man; it makes no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Quip comparing something to the wicker man rotting; no clear judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about plot elements without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about wicker rotting; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A wry observation about the wicker man’s eventual decay, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plays on the Wicker Man reference with a joke about mold and rot; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or thematic speculation without a clear judgment of the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #59 w 0.129 The wickerman is only going to rot since he got lit on fire At least, that's what the basket maker said towards the end of the movie VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.34 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail and character dialogue without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment recounts a plot detail and a character's line without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke/quote referencing the film's ending and the Wicker Man; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail and character dialogue without expressing any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot joke quoting a character; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — References a line from the movie without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot-based joke referencing a line from the film; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and a joke without a judgment of the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 The reason the wicker man was rotting was due to getting set on fire. I’m assuming since the basket weaver leaves the village with them at the end, he can weave the baby’s body until he reaches full adulthood. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains plot details and speculates about the ending without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot explanation and speculation about the ending; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Pure plot explanation and speculation about the ending, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and speculation without any opinion or judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about the ending; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and a theory about the ending without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about the wicker man's rotting and the basket weaver's ending; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories and details without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 The reason the wicker man was rotting was due to getting set on fire. No, it's just something that happens to wicker. He had a small spot on his shoulder/neck early on, and the basket maker tells a customer later that they can use vinegar for the rot on a normal basket. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.34 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about wicker rot without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about wicker rot without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details and in-film explanation of wicker rot without giving any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and explanation of movie details without any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about wicker rot; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an explanation for the wicker man's rot, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about the wicker man's rot; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail and trivia about wicker without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #62 w 0.126 The movie was surprisingly heartfelt, tackling the deep emotions of feeling unloved, especially in marriage, to discovering new ways to rekindle a dying flame (the baker and his wife doing roleplay and wanting a "third" was very entertaining but also great example of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.949 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s heartfelt themes, entertaining relationship dynamics, emotional impact, and phenomenal acting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises heartfelt themes, entertaining subplot, moving love story, and phenomenal acting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film surprisingly heartfelt, entertaining, emotionally moving (made them tear up), and praises the acting as phenomenal. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the film as heartfelt, entertaining, emotionally moving, and having phenomenal acting. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises heartfelt story, entertainment, emotion, and phenomenal acting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film’s emotional depth, entertaining scenes, moving romance, and phenomenal acting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.949 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the heartfelt themes, entertainment value, emotional moments, and phenomenal acting. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #63 w 0.125 when I as dying VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.28 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The fragment expresses no clear judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous fragment, likely a reaction to a scene; no clear judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a fragment ('when I as dying') with no clear judgment of the film; likely a joke or reference. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is an incomplete phrase or reference with no clear judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Fragment with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is an unclear fragment and gives no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a fragment with no clear judgement of the film; it is ambiguous and does not express approval or disapproval. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is incomplete and does not express an opinion on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 The bar scene was absolutely hilarious. “ she has milk and doesn’t even let me lick it.” VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.458 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling the bar scene absolutely hilarious expresses clear praise for the film's comedy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the bar scene absolutely hilarious and quotes it fondly, which is praise for the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls a scene 'absolutely hilarious' and quotes it, which signals enjoyment of the film, though no overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific scene as 'absolutely hilarious' and quotes a line they enjoyed. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene absolutely hilarious, clear enjoyment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe a scene in the film as absolutely hilarious. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes and praises a single scene's humor but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific scene as hilarious, indicating enjoyment of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #65 w 0.123 I liked it a lot, though I still feel bad for the Tailor's Wife's sister's husband dying while trying to fix the roof (so he could appear "manly" to his wife). I do feel as though it's a fantasy aimed towards older women (the romance novel cover pretty much confirms that), and… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.606 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly liked it a lot; disappointment about missing nudity is a minor caveat. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they liked it a lot; minor joking disappointment about no wicker nudity doesn't change overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with 'I liked it a lot'; the later jokes and minor disappointment about no wicker dick don't change the overall favorable verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked it a lot' despite a minor comedic disappointment regarding nudity. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it a lot; only disappointed it didn't go further sexually. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they liked it a lot; disappointment about one omitted detail is a minor caveat. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.606 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Starts with 'I liked it a lot' despite a minor complaint about a missing detail. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #66 w 0.122 I didn't take it as the Bottlewasher wanting to appear manly. It was after that pub scene where Wicker said "It makes her happy, and that makes me happy." All the other men were so insecure and mocked him, but to me it looked like Bottlewasher was the only one who realized that… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.828 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets Bottlewasher’s motivations and character development without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Character interpretation of a scene with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets a character's motivation in a scene; pure plot discussion with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses character motivations and plot details without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character interpretation of a scene; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets a character’s motivation and behavior without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of a character's motivation and a plot moment, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing an opinion on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 you could kinda see it when he was naked in the water with the fish traps and Fisherwoman was looking at him from across the river. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a scene and a character's observation without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene and a character's observation without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a specific scene or plot detail without giving any judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure scene description without expressing any opinion or judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene description only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene and a visual detail without any judgement of whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail and scene without expressing a judgment on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 This was a ton of fun. The hour and 40 minutes FLEW by. I found myself more emotionally invested than I expected to be! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.556 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film fun, praises its brisk pacing, and expresses unexpectedly strong emotional investment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a ton of fun, says runtime flew by, and was emotionally invested. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says it was a ton of fun, flew by, and was more emotionally engaging than expected—clear praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie was a ton of fun, engaging, and that they were emotionally invested. Grok 4.7: positive — Called it fun, fast-paced, and emotionally engaging. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a ton of fun and praises its pacing and emotional engagement. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it was a ton of fun, flew by, and they were more invested than expected. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it 'a ton of fun' and expresses unexpected emotional investment. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 The baker's wife asking to dance with Wicker Husband and the Baker's bar monologue had people hollering in the theater. One of the better movie experiences, so many girl dates. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.44 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it one of the better movie experiences and highlights enthusiastic audience reactions. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it one of the better movie experiences, with scenes that got the theater hollering. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Describes lively audience reactions and calls it one of the better movie experiences, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it "one of the better movie experiences" and highlights funny scenes. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it one of the better movie experiences, with enthusiastic audience reactions. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it one of the better movie experiences and highlights the fun theater reaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoyed the theater experience and calls it one of the better movie experiences, praising its comedic moments. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — One of the better movie experiences indicates a positive verdict. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #70 w 0.119 The film is great and I really enjoyed the world that the film sets up, but this is no way near as horny as the marketing has suggested, outside of a few comedic sex scenes there's nothing really that tantilising there. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.68 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film great and enjoyed its world, despite finding it less sexy than the marketing suggested. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls film great and enjoyed the world; only notes marketing overstated sexiness, not a real criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the film is great and enjoyed its world; the marketing complaint about it not being horny is a minor caveat, not a verdict on quality. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'the film is great' and that they 'really enjoyed' it despite misleading marketing. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film great and enjoyable despite marketing mismatch. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the film great and say they enjoyed its world, despite disappointment that it was less sexually tantalizing than marketed. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.68 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'The film is great and I really enjoyed the world'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I absolutely loved it. It was commentary on the patriarchy, the ways women push each other down, and how no one benefits from it. It was about who deserves to be loved. It was horny and sexy and romantic. 10/10 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.896 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They explicitly loved the film, praised its themes and romance, and rated it 10/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter absolutely loved it, praises themes and romance, rates it 10/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they absolutely loved it, praises its themes and romance, and gives it 10/10. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, praises its themes, and gives it a 10/10 rating. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved the film and rated it 10/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they absolutely loved the film and rate it 10/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly says they absolutely loved it and gives it 10/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they absolutely loved it and gives it a 10/10 rating. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #72 w 0.117 Is it possible for the wicker baby to age ? Or will it be a baby forever ? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.09 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks a plot-related question about the wicker baby without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A question about the plot that gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A speculative plot question about the wicker baby; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment asks a question about the plot/lore without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about the wicker baby; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot-related question about the wicker baby without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot/character question about the wicker baby; expresses no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is asking a plot-related question about the movie without expressing an opinion on it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Yearly “ checkups” from the Basketmaker to age him? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks a question about a plot detail without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot speculation question about the Basketmaker aging him; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A question or theory about the plot (yearly checkups from the Basketmaker to age him) with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a plot question/theory with no opinion or judgment expressed about the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot-related question without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about the age-tracking mechanic; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot question or theory without a judgment on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Is it weird I thought it would be hornier? In a post Poor Things world this is very tame tbh. It is a very sweet movie though and I love how it uses the fairytale framing to add onto the gender role commentary i.e. all the men being referred by their job and all the women being… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.866 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite expecting more sexuality, they praise its sweetness, fairytale framing, gender commentary, and humor. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes it's tamer than expected but calls it sweet, loves the fairytale gender commentary, and laughed a lot. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it very sweet, loves the fairytale framing and gender commentary, and enjoyed the laughs; the 'tame' remark is a minor quibble. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calls it a 'very sweet movie', loves the fairytale framing and commentary, and notes it got good laughs. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it sweet, loves the commentary, and laughed despite expecting more sex. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it sweet, praises its commentary and humor; the mild complaint that it is tame does not outweigh the praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.866 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a 'very sweet movie', praises its commentary, and mentions getting laughs. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 The wicker baby is the stuff of nightmares VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes the wicker baby as nightmarish without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calling the wicker baby 'the stuff of nightmares' praises its effective horror, like calling a villain terrifying. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a creepy element as nightmarish, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself; scary content alone isn't a verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a creepy visual element in the film without expressing overall approval or disapproval of the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scary element nightmarish, praising the horror rather than criticizing the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the wicker baby as frightening but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calling the wicker baby 'the stuff of nightmares' praises its unsettling horror effect, implying the film's scare works. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment describes a scary element without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | 0 | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #76 w 0.114 This movie was so great! Wonderful performances and some twists I didn’t see coming. And it was funny! Best movie I’ve seen this year. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.958 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the performances, twists, and humor, calling it the best movie seen this year. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for performances, twists, and humor; calls it best movie of the year. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the movie great, praises performances, twists and humor, and names it the best movie they've seen this year. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the movie, performances, twists, and humor, calling it the best movie they've seen this year. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicit praise: great, wonderful, funny, best of the year. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter enthusiastically praises the performances, twists, humor, and calls it their best movie of the year. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises performances, twists, humor, and calls it the best movie of the year. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film as great, citing wonderful performances, twists, and humor. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #77 w 0.113 Anyone have a picture of the Wicker Baby? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks for a picture of the Wicker Baby without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Requests a picture of a character; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter only asks for a picture of the 'Wicker Baby' and gives no opinion on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely asks for a picture of a movie prop/character without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks for a picture; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks for a picture; expresses no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks for an image of a film element; expresses no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Asking for a picture of a prop/character, unrelated to film quality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 I never thought I'd see a creepier movie baby doll than Renesme from Twilight, yet here we are. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Calls the movie's baby doll creepy without expressing whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke comparing the film's creepy baby doll to Twilight's Renesmee; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing a creepy baby doll to Renesmee from Twilight; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Jokes about a creepy baby doll prop in the film without expressing an overall verdict on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares a creepy doll to Twilight; no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The comparison praises the film’s baby doll as exceptionally creepy, suggesting the horror effect worked. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a creepy doll and compares it to another film's character; no clear judgement of this film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Makes a joke comparing a prop to Twilight without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 It looked more human than renesme VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.74 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A joke comparing appearances to Renesmee, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking comparison to Twilight's infamous CGI baby; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing a visual to Renesmee from Twilight; it gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A joke comparing a prop/character to Twilight's Renesmee, with no overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Visual comparison only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — It praises the film’s visual effect by saying it looked more human than Renesmee. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison of a creature's appearance to another character; no clear judgement of whether the film itself is good or worth recommending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Joke or comparison unrelated to judging the film itself. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 He is so creepy poor thing VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.389 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a character as creepy without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment describes a character as creepy and pitiable; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment describes a character as creepy with sympathy; no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to a character without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character reaction only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a character as creepy but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a character as creepy but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment refers to a character being creepy, but expresses no overall judgment on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 This was such a nice little movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling it a nice little movie clearly expresses approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it 'such a nice little movie,' a clear expression of liking the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it 'such a nice little movie', a clear favorable judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises the film as a 'nice little movie'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a nice little movie, clear praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie “nice,” expressing clear approval. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'such a nice little movie', a clear warm endorsement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes the movie as 'such a nice little movie', indicating a clear positive recommendation. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Just saw it, had a good time, the audience was very active in my theater and the movie was surprisingly funny as well as pretty moving. I loved the Baker couple. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.96 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They had a good time, found the movie funny and moving, and loved the Baker couple. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Had a good time, found it funny and moving, loved the Baker couple. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter had a good time, found the film funny and moving, and said they loved the Baker couple. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had a good time, praised the humor and emotion, and loved the characters. Grok 4.7: positive — Had a good time; found it funny, moving, and loved the couple. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They had a good time and praise the film's humor, emotional impact, and characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter had a good time, found the film funny and moving, and loved the Baker couple. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Had a good time, surprisingly funny, moving, and loved the characters. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 I loved how earnest this was! I wasn't sure what to expect between weird body horror, erotic fantasy or tongue in cheek humor (which there is a lot of good parts of) but it definitely wasn't how warm this ended up being ! The basket maker making it very clear how gay he was in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.951 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.85 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Loved the film’s earnestness, unexpected warmth, and humor. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved the film's earnestness and warmth, and praised its humor and funny moments. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the film's earnestness and warmth, praises the humor, and enjoyed the basket maker's scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly loved the film's earnestness, warmth, and humor. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the earnest warmth, humor, and funny scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved its earnest, warm tone and found the humor funny. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved how earnest and warm the film was, praising its humor and surprises. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly states they loved the film and praises its earnestness and humor. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 This is a fun romp of a movie. I love all the invented village traditions, the dance, the things they do to ward off bad luck. It could have gotten way darker, but they circled back around and gave us a nice way out. The only criticism I have is that there's no explanation for… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.773 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a fun romp and mighty fine fable, with only a minor criticism about unexplained magic. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a fun romp and mighty fine fable; only minor criticism about unexplained animation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a fun romp and mighty fine fable, loving the traditions; only one minor criticism about the unexplained animation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it a 'fun romp' and a 'mighty fine fable' despite one minor plot criticism. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a fun romp and mighty fine fable despite one unexplained plot point. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a fun romp and a mighty fine fable; the unexplained animation is a minor criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a fun romp and a mighty fine fable; one minor criticism about animation doesn't outweigh overall praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a fun romp and mighty fine fable despite a minor plot criticism. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 On my end I loved that there was no explanation and it just happened. To each their own. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.39 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They loved the film’s lack of explanation, expressing clear approval of its storytelling choice. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved the lack of explanation, defending a film choice others criticized. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the film's lack of explanation, expressing a clear positive view of that choice. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the lack of explanation in the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the unexplained events; personal praise of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the film’s unexplained, abrupt approach. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film's lack of explanation, expressing clear approval of it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the aspect of the film they are discussing. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Oh see I kind of thought it was implied that the basket weaver was magical because of the eggs and the line he says—“Mother Nature provides, I merely augment.” VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets the basket weaver's magical abilities without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about the basket weaver being magical; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot interpretation about the basket weaver being magical, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment purely discusses plot interpretation and character theories without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of a character's implied magic without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the plot and a quote about the basket weaver's magic, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories and dialogue without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #87 w 0.107 I disagree very strongly that there would have been any improvement by explaining how it works. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.42 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Rejects a proposed explanation but gives no clear overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends the film's choice not to explain the mechanics, implying approval of how it was handled. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Argues against explaining how something works, but gives no clear overall judgment of the film or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment defends a specific narrative choice without stating an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film as-is, rejecting a suggested improvement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They defend the film’s choice not to explain how it works, implying that the ambiguity is effective. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Argues against explaining the film's mechanics; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Defends the film's narrative choice, indicating satisfaction with the movie. | + | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #88 w 0.106 It’s a very superstitious village and the story feels like a fable so I just rolled with the notion that there’s magic in the world. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains accepting magic within the story’s setting, without evaluating or recommending the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the story's magical elements and fable tone without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Explains how they interpreted the story's world and rolled with its magic; no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the movie's setting and suspension of disbelief without expressing an opinion on whether they liked it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Accepts the fable premise; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe accepting the film’s magical premise, without judging whether they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film's story and setting as a fable, but gives no judgement of whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot and viewing mindset without giving a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 Ok so ladies how do we solve the mold problem? We need all the women in stem and booktok on this ASAP!! 🤔🧐 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.223 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.11 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about solving a plot-related mold problem without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke riffing on a plot element; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking remark about a plot-related 'mold problem' and rallying women; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a plot detail without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a plot detail, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking call for help solving a mold problem, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment asks about a mold problem and calls for women in STEM and BookTok; it does not judge the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment asks a joke question about a plot element with no judgment of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #90 w 0.105 This was so great but the best part has to be that dance. It's in the most fucked up time signature, alternating between 7 and 3 beats per measure and then throwing in random other single measures with some other time signature, so it's impossible to dance to. But the whole… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.555 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.74 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls the film great and enthusiastically praises the dance scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says 'this was so great' and enthusiastically praises the dance scene. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter opens with "This was so great" and enthusiastically praises the dance scene as the best part. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie was 'so great' and praises a specific dance scene. Grok 4.7: positive — Opens with clear praise and enthusiastically highlights the dance as the best part. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie great and praises the dance scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Opens with 'This was so great' and praises the dance scene's weird choreography and craft; clear approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter starts by stating 'This was so great' and praises specific scenes. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 I saw a weird take on Instagram. That someone felt that the movie was racist because the person said that they felt like the Wicker man was an allegory for men of color. And how white women go to foreign countries to have sex with men of color. I thought it was such a brain… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.183 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Rejects an interpretation of the film as racist, without expressing overall enjoyment or a recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Rebuts an Instagram take calling the film racist; gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter rebuts someone else's racism claim about the film, but gives no overall judgment of whether they liked or recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter argues against an interpretation of the movie being racist, without expressing if they liked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Defends film against a racism reading; no like/dislike judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They reject a claim that the film is racist but give no opinion on whether they liked or recommend it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an Instagram take about racism in the film and defends it as not racist; no clear verdict on the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a social media theory about the film without giving a personal verdict on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 Def a weird take. They are reaching. I saw a comment about the black guy trying to make a whore house for the wicker woman and then started talking about pimps. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.542 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes another person's interpretation and discusses a comment, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on other users' interpretations, not on the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter dismisses another person's interpretation as a stretch; gives no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to other viewers' interpretations without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses other comments' interpretations, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize another commenter’s interpretation, but do not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a fan theory's reach and a description of another comment; no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses other comments and plot theories without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 Faith Hill: “The new film Wicker is, first and foremost, a love story. And I need to acknowledge this promptly: It is a love story about a woman who falls for a person-shaped basket. Olivia Colman’s character, who is known to the audience only as Fisherwoman, is a classic… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.983 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Quotes an article describing the plot and marriage themes without expressing the commenter's verdict on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quotes a critic's review excerpt and link; the commenter gives no personal judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment quotes a critic's review (Faith Hill, The Atlantic) and describes the plot and themes. The commenter gives no verdict of their own. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The shared review excerpt describes the central relationship in the film as a 'strange, touching model.' Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quoted review excerpt; commenter states no personal judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s model of love “strange, touching,” expressing an appreciative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a review excerpt describing the film's premise and themes without the commenter expressing their own verdict on it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a review excerpt discussing the plot and themes without expressing a personal verdict. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #95 w 0.102 At first I wondered why Faith Hill had a write up for this movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses confusion about Faith Hill's write-up, without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or confusion about a name or credit; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Remark about Faith Hill's involvement is a curious aside, with no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke or observation about a write-up without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about Faith Hill's write-up; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment expresses confusion about a write-up, not an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter wonders about a cast member's credit; no judgement of the film's quality is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is just a random observation about casting, expressing no opinion on the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #96 w 0.102 Does anyone remember the last line Peter Dinklage said 😭 i just need remember it so i can channel my tears VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks about a line and expresses an emotional reaction, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks to recall a quote; the emotional reaction is mentioned but there is no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about a line of dialogue; mentions crying emotionally but gives no explicit judgment or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter asks for a quote from the movie to emotionally connect and cry again, indicating strong resonance. Grok 4.7: positive — Moved to tears and wants to relive the emotional ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask to recall a line and mention tears, but give no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a line of dialogue; no judgement of the film's quality is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking about a specific quote and crying about the scene, without expressing a general verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 Is it true you get to see his wicker WEINER? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A joking question about nudity, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke question about content; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking question about nudity in the film; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke and a question about the movie's content, indicating the commenter hasn't seen it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Crude joke question, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking question about the film’s content, with no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a joke/trivia question about a scene; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/question about the content, not a judgment of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #98 w 0.101 you get like a 5 second wide shot. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.50 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a shot's duration and framing without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a shot's length without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a shot length without clearly praising or criticizing the film; no overall verdict on quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes a brief shot in the film without expressing any opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Brief shot observation with no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a brief wide shot without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a single camera shot without any judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a shot length without expressing any judgment or opinion about the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 Who played the butchers wife? She seems so familiar but I can't find her listed online anywhere VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.178 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks who played a character without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about a cast member's identity; offers no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a casting trivia question about an actress; gives no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only asks a question about the cast without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Casting question only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter asks about an actor’s identity without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a cast member's identity; no judgement of the film expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking an informational question about a cast member without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |