Sense and Sensibility
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (LIVE) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (LIVE) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #5 79 Watch R 88 74/6/13 | #4 75 Watch R 79 58/14/21 | #6 59 Depends R 44 6/66/21 | #8 74 Depends R 76 50/23/20 | #9 74 Depends R 76 47/27/19 | #9 77 Watch R 82 48/31/14 | #8 76 Watch R 80 52/24/17 | #8 75 Watch R 78 49/26/18 | #8 75 Watch R 78 51/24/18 | #8 75 Watch R 79 54/20/19 | #8 74 Depends R 76 52/20/21 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 Movie fuckin ruled. We saw it with a great, buzzy, reactive crowd last night. Eleanor Dashwood is a character that just plays so well to Daisy Edgar-Jones' strengths and I'd like to see Esmé Creed-Miles in everything now tysm. They give Marianne a flip and expansion kinda like… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.936 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly says the movie ruled, praises the performances and character adaptations, and loved the take. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the movie 'ruled', praises performances, loved the take on Marianne, enjoyed the experience. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the movie 'fuckin ruled', praises the cast, the take on Marianne, and the crowd experience. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie 'ruled' and praises the actors and character adaptations. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says the movie ruled and praises the adaptation and cast. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie excellent, praises its character interpretation and performances, and says they loved the take. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the movie 'ruled', praises the cast and the reinterpretation, and says 'Loved the take.' Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter strongly praises the movie, calling it 'Movie fuckin ruled' and expressing love for the adaptation and cast. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 Fiona Shaw tha God VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises Fiona Shaw without expressing a judgment about the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises actress Fiona Shaw but gives no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises actress Fiona Shaw (Mrs. Ferrars) with a joke-y exclamation, but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Praises an actress generally without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: positive — Enthusiastic praise of Fiona Shaw’s performance in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises Fiona Shaw, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Enthusiastic praise of Fiona Shaw's performance implies approval of the film, though the comment is brief. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising Fiona Shaw's performance indicates a positive view of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Your last line made me choke on a bite of coffee cake bc I laughed so unexpectedly so thanks for that. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.553 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The commenter praises another comment's humor, not the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to another commenter's joke; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment reacts to another user's joke; it gives no opinion on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a reaction to another user's joke and does not express an opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke reply to another commenter, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They thank someone for making them laugh, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke reacting to another user's line, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a personal reaction to another user's joke, not about the film itself. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 I have had a crush on George MacKay since seeing him in 1917. So happy to see him in a romantic role! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.798 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses affection for George MacKay and excitement about his role, not a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses excitement about the actor's casting, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses a crush on an actor and happiness at his casting, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses excitement about an actor's casting without judging the actual film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Actor crush comment; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express excitement about seeing an actor in a romantic role, but don't judge the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter is happy to see the actor in a romantic role and expresses a crush, a warm endorsement of the film's casting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses an actor and the user's personal crush rather than evaluating the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 My theatre was busy too, it was a great atmosphere. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises the theatre atmosphere, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on theatre atmosphere, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on theatre crowd and atmosphere, not an explicit judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises the theater atmosphere and crowd rather than expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comments on busy theatre atmosphere, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise the theater atmosphere, but don't express an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the theatre's busy atmosphere, not a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses the theater atmosphere rather than expressing an opinion on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 Just saw it tonight in a nearly full theatre, and it was lovely when you could hear half the crowd giggling at certain moments 🤭 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.891 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Describes the shared theatrical experience as lovely, conveying enjoyment of the film’s humorous moments. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the viewing experience lovely, with the audience enjoying the humor; implies a favorable view of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter describes the screening as lovely, with the audience giggling along, indicating an enjoyable experience of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had a 'lovely' experience enjoying the comedic moments with the theater crowd. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the screening lovely and enjoys the crowd's laughter. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film lovely and enjoys the audience’s laughter. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'lovely' and describes an enjoyable theatre experience with the crowd laughing at moments. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes the film as 'lovely' and enjoyed the shared theater experience. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Having not seen the 1995 film, I adored this. Wonderful casting, and the movie knows when to kick in when it matters. The London ball and the duel were wonderfully tense I feel like this also struck a great balance between the drama of Pride and Prejudice and the comedy of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.972 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They adored the film, praising its casting, tense scenes, and effective balance of comedy and emotion. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Adored it, praising the casting, tense scenes, and the balance of comedy and emotion. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they adored the film, praising casting, tension, and its balance of comedy and drama. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'adored this' and praises the casting, pacing, tension, and balance of drama and comedy. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly adored the film; praises casting, tension, balance, and emotion. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They adored the film, praising its casting, tension, and balance of comedy and emotion. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they adored the film, praising casting, tension, and balance of comedy and drama. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they adored the film, praising the casting, tension, comedy, and emotion. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Having not seen the 1995 film Oh god, it’s so good. Do yourself a favor and watch it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.79 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film very good and explicitly recommends watching it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises the 1995 adaptation, apparently a different film than this thread's; no judgement of this version. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the 1995 film is 'so good' and urges others to watch it, a clear recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the 1995 film as 'so good' and strongly recommends watching it. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film so good and urges others to watch it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call it good and recommend watching it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film is 'so good' and urges others to watch it, despite a garbled opening about not having seen it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film and tells others to watch it. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #8 w 0.333 Right? It’s pretty close to perfect. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.784 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling the film nearly perfect expresses strong praise. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film pretty close to perfect, a clear positive verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film 'pretty close to perfect', a clear endorsement. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film, calling it "pretty close to perfect." Grok 4.7: positive — Agrees the film is nearly perfect; clear praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film close to perfect, expressing clear praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film 'pretty close to perfect', a clear strong endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes the movie as 'pretty close to perfect'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #9 w 0.316 Yes, I adore Alan Rickman and am in the theater getting ready to see this version VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.832 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.60 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses love for Alan Rickman but has not yet seen this version of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet; only expresses admiration for Alan Rickman. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter praises Alan Rickman but hasn't yet seen the film; no verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is about to watch the film and has not yet formed a verdict on it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film yet; only praises the actor. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise Alan Rickman but have not yet seen the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter adores Alan Rickman and is eager to see the film, signaling anticipation and enthusiasm. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter is about to watch the movie, so they haven't seen it yet. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 She does, and Esme Creed Miles shows that she has the ability to carry a film too VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises Esme Creed-Miles’s acting ability without expressing a verdict on Sense and Sensibility itself. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the lead actress as capable of carrying the film, implying approval of the performance and film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises an actress's ability, but it's unclear whether it's about this film (Esme Creed Miles isn't in Sense and Sensibility); no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the lead actress's performance and her ability to carry the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises an actress's ability, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Esme Creed-Miles's ability to carry the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the young actress's ability to carry the film, implying approval of the performance and film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the lead actor's ability to carry the film indicates a favorable view. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Col Brandon is throwing Willoughby out of the house, and all of sudden they're dueling. That escalated quickly! I don't think the Ang Lee version can be topped, but I really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take on the story. It's hard to fuck up Jane Austen. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.724 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They explicitly really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic adaptation, despite preferring Ang Lee's version. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed this gloomier take, though they consider the Ang Lee version superior. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic adaptation, despite thinking Ang Lee's version can't be topped. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed this version, even if they prefer the Ang Lee adaptation. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed this gloomier naturalistic adaptation despite preferring Ang Lee's version. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take, despite preferring the Ang Lee version. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take and praises it, despite noting the Ang Lee version is hard to top. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter stated they really enjoyed the gloomier, naturalistic take on the story. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #12 w 0.277 Marianne being more worried for Col. Brandon than Willoughby was the cherry on the top of the whole dueling scene, she knew Brandon would be a keeper. I love seeing Mrs. Jennings being excited about witnessing the duel much to the chargin of the Dashwoods lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.828 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the dueling scene and enjoys Mrs. Jennings’s reaction. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic about the dueling scene, calling it a 'cherry on top' and loving Mrs. Jennings' reaction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter expresses affection for specific scenes and characters ("I love seeing...", "cherry on top"), implying enjoyment of the film, though no explicit overall recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses enjoyment of specific character moments and scenes in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoys key scenes, calling one the cherry on top and loving another. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They express enjoyment of the dueling scene and Mrs. Jennings’s reaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and character moments in the duel scene without stating an overall judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Expresses enjoyment of specific scenes and characters in the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #13 w 0.267 There were laughs in the cinema that the whole Col Brandon vs Willoughby duel went from 0-100 and then back to 0 🤣 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.751 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes audience laughter and jokes about the duel’s abrupt escalation without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes audience laughing at the abrupt duel scene; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes audience laughter at an abrupt plot moment, which reads as an observation or joke rather than a clear judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes audience reaction to a specific plot point/trivia without expressing a personal verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Jokes about a scene's abrupt pacing; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe the audience's reaction to a scene but give no overall opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes audience laughter at a plot moment (the duel) without any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is sharing an amusing audience reaction to a specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 I don't think the Ang Lee version can be topped, but I really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take on the story. It's hard to fuck up Jane Austen. I haven’t seen it yet (for sure going to), but there’s no need to “topple” the Ang Lee adaptation. Making a more faithful… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.756 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the Ang Lee film a five-star masterpiece and praises the newer take as enjoyable. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — The enjoyment line seems quoted; the commenter says they haven't seen it yet, only intending to watch. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take, though the comment later says they haven't seen it yet; the opening enjoyment reads as the verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The comment expresses strong praise and enjoyment for both the 1995 Ang Lee masterpiece and the newer adaptation. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film yet; only praises the older adaptation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really enjoyed this gloomier, naturalistic take, despite preferring the Ang Lee adaptation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the gloomier take and calls the Ang Lee version a masterpiece, while also saying they haven't seen this one yet, though they plan to watch it, so the verdict leans p Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoyed this take and is for sure going to watch it. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #15 w 0.25 To me, it was very Bronte does Jane Austen. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares the film’s style to Brontë and Austen without expressing approval or disapproval. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the adaptation's tone as Bronte-like without saying whether they liked or disliked it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A stylistic comparison (Brontë-like take on Austen) with no clear judgement of whether the film was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a neutral stylistic comparison without stating whether the commenter liked or disliked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Stylistic comparison only; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is a stylistic comparison, not a clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison to Bronte and Austen styles; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Stylistic comparison without expressing a clear positive or negative judgment on the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 A great film. Absolutely beautiful, the score is amazing. The part where Marianne is wandering in the woods and the hunting dogs run by her is so cool. "WILLOUGHBY!!!" VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.951 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a great, beautiful film, praises the score, and enthusiastically highlights a scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a great, beautiful film with an amazing score and praises a specific scene. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a great film, praises its beauty, score, and a specific scene as cool. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a great, beautiful film with an amazing score. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film great, beautiful, and praises the score and a scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a great, beautiful film and praises its score and a memorable scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a great, absolutely beautiful film and praises the score and scenes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a great, beautiful film with an amazing score. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #17 w 0.236 I got chills from her screaming his name, I think the actress absolutely nailed it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the actress’s performance and describes a powerful emotional reaction to the scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the actress's emotional scene, saying it gave chills and she absolutely nailed it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the actress's performance and says the scene gave them chills, expressing a favorable view of the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the actress's emotional performance, stating she 'absolutely nailed it' and gave them chills. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a chilling scene and the actress's performance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the actress's performance and say the scene gave them chills. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the actress's performance, saying she absolutely nailed the scene and gave them chills. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the actress's performance and the emotional impact indicates a positive verdict on the film. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #18 w 0.229 As someone who never read the book or watched any prior adaptations and knows anything about the story or characters, I really enjoyed this! Particularly how the dashwood sisters were portrayed, as sometimes you don't get convincing sibling relationships in other movies. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.387 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They really enjoyed the film and particularly praised the convincing portrayal of the Dashwood sisters' relationship. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter really enjoyed the film, praising the convincing portrayal of the Dashwood sisters' relationship. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the film and praises the convincing portrayal of the Dashwood sisters' sibling relationships. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie and praises the portrayal of the sisters' relationship. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and sibling portrayals. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really enjoyed the film, especially the portrayal of the Dashwood sisters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly says they really enjoyed the film and praises the sisters' portrayal. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they really enjoyed the movie, specifically praising the portrayal of the sibling relationships. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 The book is excellent, obviously. Jane Austen has a wicked, cheerfully cynical cleverness that simply can’t be adapted well on the screen. The Ang Lee movie is fantastic, just a masterpiece, and one of the most beautiful movies ever shot. I recommend you treat yourself to both.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.984 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — They haven't seen this adaptation; their praise concerns Ang Lee's film, the book, and this film's trailer. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen this film; praises the book and the Ang Lee version, only excited about this one. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen this film; praise is for the book and Ang Lee's version, not the one discussed. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter praises the Ang Lee version, though explicitly states they have not seen the specific adaptation being discussed. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not seen this adaptation; praises book and Ang Lee film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise the book and Ang Lee adaptation, but say they haven’t seen this film yet. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the Ang Lee film a fantastic masterpiece and recommends it, though they haven't seen this one yet and are excited by others' praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the Ang Lee movie a masterpiece, beautiful, and highly recommends it. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #20 w 0.218 Have you seen it yet? What did you think? I'm not OP, but I went into this tonight knowing nothing about the story (and my only experience with Austen was reading P&P years ago which I didn't like, but I think I'm due for a redo) and absolutely loved it. What a rollercoaster of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.876 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They absolutely loved it, praised the emotional journey, and said the entire cast nailed their performances. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter absolutely loved it, praising the emotional rollercoaster, the cast, and Daisy Edgar Jones's performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they absolutely loved the film, praising the cast, emotional rollercoaster, and performances. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'absolutely loved it' and praises the cast and performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Absolutely loved the film and praised the cast. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they absolutely loved it and praise the cast’s performances. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'absolutely loved it,' praises the cast and performances, and hopes the actress gets more leading roles. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they absolutely loved it and praises the cast and acting. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #21 w 0.213 I enjoyed the movie. It was fairly true to the story (some changes that ended up being ok). However, the casting of Eliot Sumner as Mr. Palmers was very distracting. Thankfully not in the film too much. It was like a 17 year old boy being married to a middle aged woman. Didn’t… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.848 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie and its faithfulness despite finding one casting choice distracting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed the movie and found it faithful; one distracting casting choice is a minor flaw. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they enjoyed the movie and found it true to the story; the casting complaint is a minor criticism that doesn't change the overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie despite a minor casting complaint. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the film overall despite one distracting casting choice. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the movie and found it faithful overall, despite criticizing one distracting casting choice. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.848 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I enjoyed the movie' despite a minor casting complaint. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #22 w 0.209 I agree! It was the only miss in the whole movie. He was like some child playing dress-up. I understand the director wanted some non binary actor/representation but the role she gave them just made them look ridicolous. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.439 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling it the movie’s only miss implies an otherwise positive assessment, despite criticizing one casting choice. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Calls this casting 'the only miss', implying the rest of the film was good, while criticising one role. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls one casting 'the only miss in the whole movie,' implying everything else worked; overall lean is favorable despite the criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calling one casting choice "the only miss in the whole movie" implies the rest of the film succeeded. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls one casting choice the only miss, implying the rest of the film worked. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the casting the only miss, implying they liked the movie overall despite this criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.439 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls an aspect of the movie a 'miss' and 'ridiculous', indicating a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| thread #23 w 0.204 It threw me for a loop because I am not one bit worried about a period drama having “inclusivity” when the entirety of the cast is white. Really such a stupid decision. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.417 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the film’s casting or inclusivity decision stupid, expressing clear criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls a decision tied to the film 'really such a stupid decision', a criticism of the production. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter's complaint is about an inclusivity decision/controversy, with a muddled stance; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a creative or casting decision in the film, calling it 'such a stupid decision'. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls a casting/inclusivity choice in the film a stupid decision. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call a decision in the film stupid, expressing clear criticism of it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter calls the casting decision 'really such a stupid decision,' a clear criticism of the film's choices. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the casting decision 'really such a stupid decision', expressing clear criticism of the film. | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #24 w 0.2 Really took me out of the story, very odd and distracting casting choice. Poor actor as well. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.723 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the casting and acting as distracting and immersion-breaking. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises casting as distracting and an actor as poor, saying it pulled them out of the story. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says the casting choice took them out of the story and calls an actor poor, criticizing the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the casting and acting as distracting and poor, which ruined their immersion in the story. Grok 4.7: negative — Casting and acting pulled them out of the story. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found the casting distracting and the actor poor, criticizing the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says the casting choice took them out of the story and calls the actor poor; clear criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the casting and acting, stating it ruined the story for them. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #25 w 0.196 That’s a good way to put it, that it took you out of the story. I was so into the story and then that character had lines and I immediately “snapped out of it” and was just confused. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes a character’s dialogue for breaking immersion and causing confusion. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Was immersed in the story, but one character's lines broke immersion and confused them; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Commenter was absorbed in the story until one character's lines broke immersion; praise of engagement plus a specific criticism, no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter was deeply engaged in the story, but a specific character's lines ruined their immersion. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques one character's lines breaking immersion, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the character’s lines for pulling them out of the story and leaving them confused. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses how a character's lines pulled them out of the story, but gives no clear overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter indicates the film pulled them out of the story, signaling a negative experience. | + | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #26 w 0.192 I was completely taken out of the movie every time Mr. Palmer was in it. If the audience can see the actor working at it (lowering the voice, holding the posture, putting on the scowl), the joke falls apart, because Mr. Palmer's comedy depends on how easy it is for him. He’s… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.818 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes Mr. Palmer’s performance as painfully forced and repeatedly immersion-breaking. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Harshly criticizes Mr. Palmer's casting and performance as painful and immersion-breaking; no praise of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the Mr. Palmer performance as painful and immersion-breaking, comparing it unfavorably to Hugh Laurie's version; no offsetting praise for the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter strongly criticizes a performance in this adaptation, calling it painful and saying it broke their immersion. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes a performance as immersion-breaking and painful, with no praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found Mr. Palmer’s performance painful and said it undermined the comedy, criticizing the film’s portrayal. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.818 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter found the performance painful and was taken out of the movie, leading to a negative review. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #27 w 0.189 I enjoyed this but it’s really hard to beat the 1995 Emma Thompson/Ang Lee version for me. So excuse me if I spend a lot of this comparing the two, obviously there is so much to consider when a 200 year old novel that’s been adapted countless times gets a new iteration. But my… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.997 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly enjoyed it and calls it a perfectly good adaptation, despite preferring the 1995 version and noting flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Enjoyed it and calls it a good, faithful adaptation, but criticizes the loud emotions, lost comedy and washed-out colors. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Opens with 'I enjoyed this' and calls it a perfectly good adaptation, but criticizes louder emotions, lost comedy, washed-out color; no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Enjoyed it as a faithful adaptation, but criticizes the loud emotions, lost comedy, and washed-out visuals. Grok 4.7: mixed — Enjoyed it and called it good, but preferred 1995 and criticized tone, comedy, and look. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They enjoyed it and call it a perfectly good adaptation, but criticize its emotional style, lost comedy, and washed-out visuals. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.997 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The user says 'I really wanted to lov[e it]' and prefers the 1995 version, finding this adaptation too loud and washed out. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #28 w 0.186 The ‘95 version is basically perfect, hard to top that one. I felt this new one tried too much to make everything obvious for modern audience, like they don't trust us to understand the quiet pain. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the new adaptation for overexplaining emotions and losing the subtlety of the praised 1995 version. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the new film for over-explaining and not trusting audiences; prefers the '95 version. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the new adaptation for over-explaining and not trusting the audience, while praising the 1995 version as superior. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticises the film for being overly obvious and lacking trust in the audience compared to the 1995 version. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the new film for over-explaining and not trusting the audience. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the new version for overexplaining and not trusting viewers to understand its emotional subtext. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.153 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises the new version for making things too obvious and not trusting the audience. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #29 w 0.183 Yes agree with everything, and can I also add that there were scenes where the camera was too shaky and it was off putting to me (I get motion sickness with that sort of camerawork). VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.511 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes shaky camerawork as off-putting and motion-sickness-inducing. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Agrees with a prior comment and adds a complaint that the shaky camerawork was off-putting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter agrees with prior (apparently critical) points and adds a complaint about shaky camerawork that bothered them; leans negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's shaky camerawork, calling it off-putting and causing motion sickness. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes shaky camerawork as off-putting; no praise of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s shaky camerawork as off-putting and motion-sickness-inducing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.511 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the camerawork for being too shaky and off-putting. | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #30 w 0.18 I am a big Austen fan and I really liked this. I'm not sure it will beat the Ang Lee version for me, but so much of that is about the age you saw the movie at. I think this might be the Gen Alpha fave going forward. As much as I enjoy the 1995 cast, this cast is obviously more… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.996 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly liked and recommends the film, praising its cast, emotional approach, and visuals despite some criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really liked it and would definitely recommend it, despite criticizing the hair and the second dance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really liked it, would definitely recommend it and see it on the big screen; criticisms (hair, dance, dialogue snappiness) are minor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really liked it and would definitely recommend seeing it on the big screen. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it overall and would recommend it despite hair, dance, and dialogue flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really liked the film, praise its naturalistic style, and would definitely recommend it despite specific criticisms. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.996 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they really liked it and would definitely recommend it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #31 w 0.177 This is refreshing to hear as another Austen lover who enjoyed the movie! The review thread over on [ r/janeausten ]( r/janeausten ) is SO dour lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.903 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The commenter explicitly says they enjoyed the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they enjoyed the movie, contrasting with negative reviews elsewhere. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they are an Austen lover who enjoyed the movie and contrasts it with a dour review thread. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they enjoyed the movie as an Austen lover. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly says they enjoyed the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they enjoyed the movie and contrasts it favorably with a dour review thread. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #32 w 0.174 Oh no I’ll go look bc im curious but I don’t think it’ll change my favorable opinion, similar to the above comment. I understood the stylistic choices well (I think) and although some camera shots were too obvious (eg, panning like too suddenly to Elinor and Edward’s hands… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.965 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.30 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly favorable opinion; minor camera criticisms don't outweigh feeling bubbly and romantic afterward. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Holds a favorable opinion despite minor camera criticisms; left feeling bubbly and romantic. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter maintains a favorable opinion, notes minor flaws in camera work, but left feeling bubbly and romantic, leaning clearly positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they have a favorable opinion and left feeling bubbly and romantic despite minor camera critique. Grok 4.7: positive — Favorable opinion; felt bubbly and romantic despite minor camera critique. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe a favorable opinion and say the film left them feeling bubbly and romantic, despite a minor camera-shot criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter has a favorable opinion, noting minor flaws but feeling bubbly and romantic after watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they have a favorable opinion and went home feeling bubbly and romantic. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #33 w 0.171 I also really enjoyed this movie (as an Austen fan and fan of both the 1995 and BBC adaptations) but I did not like the dance scenes. To be fair, I happen to know a LOT about the kind of dancing they did at the time, so it's not exactly a fault of the movie but more a case of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.99 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly enjoyed and loved the film overall, praising performances and sisterly dynamics despite criticism of dance scenes. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed and loved it overall, praising cast and sisterly bond; minor complaint about anachronistic dance scenes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed and loved it, praising cast and sisterly bond; only minor complaint about dance scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed and loved the movie despite disliking the anachronistic dance scenes. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film and cast despite disliking some dance scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite disliking the dance scenes, they otherwise loved the film and praise its cast, performances, and sisterly bond. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.99 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly states they "really enjoyed this movie" and "otherwise loved it", despite a minor gripe about the dancing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I think the was purposely meant to be a contemporary take on an historical dance, rather than a representation. Look at the choreographer and you'll see they were chosen for a reason. I don't know much about Georgian dancing, but (1) could tell this was not historically… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.723 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They loved the dance despite historical inaccuracies, praising it as delightfully odd and intense. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved the dance scene despite historical inaccuracy, calling it delightfully odd and intense. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they 'bloody loved' the dance scene and found it delightfully odd and intense, despite its historical inaccuracy. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'bloody loved' the choreography and found it 'delightfully odd, and intense'. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the dance scene despite knowing it was historically inaccurate. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They acknowledge the dance was not historically accurate but say they loved its delightfully odd, intense interpretation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.723 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'bloody loved it' despite historical inaccuracies. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #35 w 0.167 In the book the age gap between Brandon and Marianne is 18 or 19 years. The film seems to shrink the gap considerably (not sure how old Marianne is supposed to be here, but they seem maybe 10 years apart?). That probably makes the pairing easier for modern audiences to accept,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.975 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the adaptation for weakening Austen’s intent and lacking romantic chemistry, despite mild praise for Brandon. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says shrinking the age gap weakens Austen's intent and Brandon lacks chemistry; only mild praise for the actor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked this Brandon well enough, but criticizes the shrunken age gap and lacking chemistry compared to the 1995 version and book. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's adaptation choices and lack of chemistry compared to the book and earlier version. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for shrinking the age gap and lacking Brandon-Marianne chemistry. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They liked this version of Brandon, but felt the adaptation weakened Austen’s point and lacked chemistry. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.975 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's adaptation choices and notes a lack of chemistry. | + | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − |
| thread #36 w 0.164 I really liked it. Glad I didn't listen to the 1995 purists who said it couldn't be topped. These novels will continue to be adapted for years to come and it's always nice to see them done differently, big or small. The ladies returning to bed after the duel scene at the window… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.97 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly says they really liked it, praising its fresh adaptation, humor, and performances. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they really liked it, praises a funny scene and Fiona Shaw, glad they ignored purists. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter states 'I really liked it', praises cast and humor, and is glad they ignored purists who dismissed new adaptations. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I really liked it' and praises the actors and comedic scenes. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked the adaptation and praised performances and scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really liked the film and praise its humor, cast, and fresh adaptation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.97 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I really liked it' and praises multiple aspects of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #37 w 0.162 Agreed, you can like both. I think it’s cool to have multiple versions. Not everything needs to be a perfect adaptation. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.863 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Supports multiple adaptations generally without expressing a clear judgment of this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — General comment about multiple adaptations coexisting; no judgement of this specific film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment speaks generally about enjoying multiple adaptations without giving a clear verdict on this specific film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter defends the film as a worthwhile adaptation, implying they liked both versions. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — General take on adaptations, no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express approval of having multiple adaptations, but give no clear opinion on this film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses adaptations generally and multiple versions; no clear judgement of this film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Appreciates multiple versions of the film despite adaptation flaws. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #38 w 0.16 And it's great to revive classic stories for a new audience - 30 years between films is the perfect gap VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.881 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.42 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises reviving classic stories and the timing between adaptations, without judging this film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on remaking classics and the timing between films, without judging this film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments generally on reviving classic stories and the gap between adaptations; no explicit judgment of this film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Approves of the concept of remaking the story after 30 years without judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises remaking classics and timing, not this film's quality. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise reviving the story for a new audience and say the gap between films is perfect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's revival of a classic story and the timing of the remake as a good idea. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film adaptation ('great to revive classic stories'). | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #39 w 0.158 I really love in this adaptation is how Margaret is a bit of a smart ass, mischevous yet cheeky girl compared to her sisters. Even though the story is mainly on Elinor and Marianne, I'm glad she gets some nice moments on screen despite usually being relegated to supporting/side… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.913 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the adaptation’s portrayal of Margaret and appreciates her adorable moments and increased screen presence. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses love for this adaptation's portrayal of Margaret, finding her moments adorable and welcome. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really love this adaptation's portrayal of Margaret, finding her moments adorable and being glad of them. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises this adaptation's portrayal and screen time of the character Margaret. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises this adaptation’s Margaret and her charming screen moments. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the adaptation’s portrayal of Margaret and describe her moments as adorable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'really love' this adaptation and enjoys Margaret's moments, finding them adorable. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses clear affection for this adaptation and specific aspects of it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #40 w 0.156 I couldn't stop thinking about how Marianne not only looks like she knows what an iPhone is, but that she could probably also explain whatever 6-7 means. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.029 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about Marianne looking modern without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Joking complaint that Marianne looks too modern, which kept distracting them; implies criticism of casting and period authenticity. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about Marianne seeming modern; it makes no judgement about whether the film is good or recommendable. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a character's modern appearance without giving a verdict on the film overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Marianne looking anachronistically modern; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about Marianne seeming modern; it expresses no opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about anachronisms in a costume drama; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a character's appearance and internet memes, not a judgment of the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 The actress is Samantha Morton's daughter. To me, iphone face = injections and surgery. I think her face is natural. So it didn't feel like iphone face to me. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.1 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses the actress’s appearance and whether it looks natural, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's appearance and parentage; offers no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses an actress's appearance and whether her face looks altered; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's parentage and appearance without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's appearance, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the actress’s appearance, not on the film’s quality or whether they liked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an actress's face and casting trivia without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses an actor's appearance and genetics without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #42 w 0.152 Her face is not natural :/ she has a LOT of lip filler. She resembled her mother a lot more when she was younger. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.019 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.21 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Comments on an actress’s appearance, not the film’s quality or whether they recommend it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment about an actress's appearance and lip filler, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment critiques an actress's appearance and cosmetic work, offering no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses an actress's physical appearance and cosmetic procedures, offering no opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comments on an actress's appearance, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the actress’s appearance, not the film’s quality or recommendability. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an actress's appearance and lip filler, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor's appearance, not the film itself. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Meanwhile she has very obvious filler migration even on the poster. I can’t believe they didn’t make her dissolve. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes an actress’s appearance and cosmetic filler, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Remarks on an actress's cosmetic filler on the poster, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Obscure joke or remark about a poster and 'filler migration'; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes an actress's cosmetic procedures on the poster without evaluating the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about an actress’s appearance, not a judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the actor’s appearance and cosmetic fillers, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment jokes about the actress's appearance and a missing visual effect; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the physical appearance of an actor and the production choices on the poster. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 I think too many people think fuller lips = lip filler. I’m honestly not familiar with the actress beyond the film, but there was nothing fake looking about her imo. Also, some people just have naturally fuller lips. Doesnt automatically mean they’ve had work done. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.652 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses the actress’s lips and cosmetic surgery assumptions without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses actress's lips and filler speculation; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses whether an actress's lips look natural, not any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's physical appearance and lip filler assumptions without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's appearance, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the actress’s appearance, not whether the commenter liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actress's lips and cosmetic work, not a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses an actress's appearance and makeup/plastic surgery rumors, not the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 It’s the lip filler for sure. Way too much VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes lip filler, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on an actor's lip filler, not an overall judgment of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment criticizes an apparent cosmetic detail (lip filler), likely about an actor, without clearly judging the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only remarks on an actor's physical appearance without giving an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Remarks on lip filler, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes someone’s appearance, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an actress's lip filler, a cosmetic observation with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses cosmetic procedures on an actor, not a verdict on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Could they have found a young actress with an all-original face? Perhaps not VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the casting, implying the young actress looks cosmetically altered and unsuitable. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Snarky jab at the casting, implying the actress's altered face suits the period film poorly. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous remark about casting an actress's face; no clear judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the casting and appearance of an actress in the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Mild criticism of the young actress's unoriginal casting GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The comment sarcastically criticizes the film’s casting of a young actress with an unoriginal-looking face. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Complains the casting of a young actress is unoriginal-looking; mild criticism of the film's casting choice, leaning negative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizing the casting choice implies a negative view of the film. | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #47 w 0.144 by the end of the movie I thought she was fantastic and forgot all about her iphone face, but there was definitely a long moment at the top of the movie (where it literally opens on her face) that I was thinking "Uh oh. This looks like a girl with a regular Starbucks order." VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite initial doubts about her appearance, the commenter ultimately found her performance fantastic. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Initial doubt about the actress's modern look, but ultimately found her fantastic; overall leans positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the actress was fantastic by the end and their initial doubts faded, implying a favorable view of the performance and film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had initial doubts about an actress's modern look, but ultimately found her performance fantastic. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — About an actress's look and performance, not the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They initially doubted her fit, but ultimately found her fantastic and forgot the concern. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.883 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Ended up thinking she was fantastic despite initial doubts. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #48 w 0.143 The gender blind casting of Mr. Palmer also took me out of it VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the casting for disrupting immersion in the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says a casting choice 'also took me out of it', implying multiple complaints about the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says a casting choice (gender-blind Mr. Palmer) pulled them out of the film, a criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a casting choice, stating that it negatively impacted their immersion in the adaptation. Grok 4.7: negative — Casting choice broke immersion, criticizing the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the casting choice took them out of the film, indicating a negative reaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — The commenter says the casting choice 'took me out of it', a criticism that distracted them from the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter disliked a casting choice, stating it took them out of the film. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Such an odd choice tbh. Way too fem VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Dismisses the film as an odd choice and excessively feminine. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes a creative choice in the film as odd and 'way too fem'; disapproving, no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls it an 'odd choice' and 'way too fem', which reads as a dismissive criticism of the film, though vague. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film or a casting choice within it as an 'odd choice' and 'way too fem'. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film an odd choice and too feminine. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film as an odd choice and say it is too feminine. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film's choice odd and says it's 'way too fem', a clear dislike of the film's tone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film as an odd choice and 'way too fem'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #50 w 0.14 Daisy Edgar Jones and George MacKay were wonderful as Elinor and Edward! I know it was hard to top Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant's take, seeing Elinor and Edward proclaim their love to each other with the kisses and then going back to the cottage, it's beautiful to see two… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.966 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the lead performances and describes the romantic resolution as beautiful. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises lead performances as wonderful and calls the romantic ending beautiful; clear enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the leads as wonderful and calls the couple's happy ending beautiful, despite acknowledging the earlier adaptation was hard to top. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the lead actors as wonderful and calls the romantic resolution beautiful. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the leads and calls the romantic ending beautiful. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the performances and calls the lovers’ happy ending beautiful. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the leads 'wonderful' and praises the romance, saying it's beautiful to see the happy ending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the actors and calls the ending beautiful and satisfying. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #51 w 0.139 I didn't care for it. Sense and Sensibility is probably the novel I've read most often from Austen. Certain interactions in the film never occurred in the novel and while no one rewrite destroyed the interpretation the most jarring was the death of Eliza AND her daughter. In… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.987 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Explicitly disliked it, criticizing adaptation changes, characterization, and styling despite praising several supporting performances. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Opens with 'didn't care for it'; criticizes adaptation changes, Brandon, styling; some side characters praised but overall negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Opens with 'I didn't care for it' and criticizes adaptation changes, Brandon's characterization, styling, and main cast, though some actors are praised. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states 'I didn't care for it' and extensively criticizes the book-to-film changes, styling, and main characters. Grok 4.7: negative — Opens with not caring for it; main cast and changes dragged it down despite side characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They explicitly didn't care for it and say major character and adaptation choices dragged the film down, despite praising some supporting performances. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.987 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states 'I didn't care for it' and details numerous issues that dragged the production down. | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #52 w 0.137 I agree with you but boy, are you bad at spelling names! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.648 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Agrees with an unspecified point and criticizes spelling, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with an unseen comment and jokes about spelling; no judgement of the film itself is stated. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment agrees with someone vaguely and jokes about their spelling; gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only addresses another user's spelling without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees with another commenter; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment criticizes someone’s spelling, not the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only criticizes spelling of names in another post; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses spelling, not the film itself. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #53 w 0.136 I'm bad at spelling a lot of things VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.542 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment discusses spelling ability and expresses no opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Off-topic remark about the commenter's own spelling; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is an unrelated remark about the commenter's spelling, with no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is an off-topic remark about spelling and contains no opinion or mention of the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Off-topic remark about spelling; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only mentions spelling and gives no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is about spelling and says nothing about the film or whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is unrelated to the film and is just about spelling. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #55 w 0.134 If it’s the novel you’ve read the most, then I don’t understand how you could possibly misspell or not know the main love interest’s name (Ferras). VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.758 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes another commenter’s knowledge of a character’s name, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Pedantic reply about another user misspelling a character's name; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment nitpicks someone's knowledge of the novel and a character's name spelling; offers no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes another user's spelling of a character's name without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Corrects a character name from the novel; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment criticizes someone’s knowledge of the novel, not the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment critiques someone's knowledge of the novel's character name, not the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a book detail and a user's spelling, not the film itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 Aesthetically and tonally this film often feels very Austen by way of the Bronte sisters, which works fine, and certainly sets it apart from the Ang Lee version. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.494 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.85 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Says the film’s distinctive aesthetic and tone work fine, expressing mild approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the Bronte-like tone 'works fine' and distinguishes it from Ang Lee's version; a mild, approving lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the aesthetic/tonal approach 'works fine' and sets it apart favorably; mild but leaning positive judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter states the film's aesthetic and tonal approach 'works fine' and positively distinguishes it from another adaptation. Grok 4.7: positive — Mild approval that the Austen-Bronte tone works and distinguishes the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The Austen-meets-Brontë style is said to work fine and distinguish the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says the film's tone 'works fine' and sets it apart favorably from another adaptation; mild but clear approval. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's aesthetic and tone, stating that it "works fine" and sets it apart. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #57 w 0.131 I love the book but this movie fell really flat for me. The pacing is very quick, it feels like the movie is going through checklist of what must happen and tries to just get through it. It lasts for 2 hours but I felt it didn't leave any breathing room! In the book, going to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.994 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite some casting praise, they found the film flat, rushed, and disappointing compared with the book. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says it fell flat and wished they could love it; criticizes pacing, costumes and a casting choice despite some praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Opens with 'fell really flat' and lists many criticisms (pacing, costumes, Marianne), but praises several cast members and the shots; 6/10 shows no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Despite praising some casting and giving a 6/10, the overall verdict is disappointment ('fell really flat', 'wished I could love'). Grok 4.7: negative — Fell flat overall; 6/10 and wished they could love it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising some casting and shots, they say it fell flat and rate it 6/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says the movie 'fell really flat,' lists many misses, and gives a 6/10 while wishing they could love it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Despite some casting praise, the commenter states the movie fell flat, had bad pacing, and gave it a 6/10. | + | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #58 w 0.13 Saw this earlier this year because UK got it a month or so prior but found it extremely charming and well acted VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.865 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They praise the film as extremely charming and well acted. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter found the film extremely charming and well acted. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter found the film extremely charming and well acted, a clear positive verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film as 'extremely charming and well acted'. Grok 4.7: positive — Found the film extremely charming and well acted. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film extremely charming and well acted. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter found the film extremely charming and well acted, a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter found the film extremely charming and well acted. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #59 w 0.129 Esmé (Maryanne) looked so much like Easy A/Zombieland era Emma Stone. they could play sisters and i'd 100% believe it. she KILLED it in this movie, as did the whole cast, but shout out to Fiona Shaw. she was the highlight alongside the younger daughter. a solid balance of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.988 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises cast, humor, emotion, and pacing; really enjoyed it overall, rates it 8/10, and would buy it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises cast, humor, pacing; minor wish for more scenes; 8/10, would buy on 4K. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the cast, humor, emotion and pacing, says they really enjoyed it, gives 8/10 and would buy on 4K; only a minor wish for more scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie, praising the cast and pacing, and gives it an 8/10. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises cast, pacing, and enjoyment; rates 8/10 and would buy it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the cast, humor, pacing, and overall enjoyment; minor wish for more sister scenes doesn’t outweigh the positive verdict. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.988 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user praises the acting, pacing, and overall experience, giving it an 8/10 and recommending a purchase. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #60 w 0.128 Fiona Shaw made this movie for me, she hit every note just right VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises Fiona Shaw’s performance as the element that made the movie enjoyable. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Fiona Shaw's performance as what made the movie for them, an overall positive verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says Fiona Shaw 'made this movie' for them and hit every note right, which is clear praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises Fiona Shaw's performance as having made the movie for them. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a performance that made the movie for them. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise Fiona Shaw’s performance as making the movie work for them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises Fiona Shaw's performance, saying she hit every note just right, indicating approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising a key actor's performance indicates a clear positive verdict. | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #61 w 0.127 Maybe I am too much of an Austen purist but I think they went too far with changing the Edward/Lucy backstory from the book. It was not some arranged engagement to a rich girl he nobly upheld when she became penniless. He proposed to her as a young man and kept it secret to not… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.968 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the adaptation’s backstory changes for distorting Edward’s character and undermining Elinor’s reasons for loving him. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's changes to Edward's backstory as too drastic and damaging to his character. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's changes to Edward/Lucy backstory as too drastic and damaging to his character, though it's a focused critique rather than an overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's drastic, negative changes to a character's backstory and characterization compared to the book. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for drastically changing Edward’s backstory and undermining his character. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s changes to Edward’s backstory as too drastic and damaging to his character. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.968 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's changes to the character and plot. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #62 w 0.126 Really impressed with what Focus Features has been putting out lately. The casting was a standout here, especially for an adaptation. Daisy as Elinor and George as Edward felt like such natural fit. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.872 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s standout casting and the leads’ natural fit for their roles. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the casting as a standout and says the leads were natural fits; overall approving. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the casting as a standout and calls Daisy and George natural fits, showing a clearly favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses being impressed and praises the film's casting as a standout. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the adaptation and casting as a standout natural fit. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the casting as a standout and says the leads felt like natural fits. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter is 'really impressed' and praises the casting as a standout, a clear endorsement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Impressed with the studio and praises the casting and adaptation as a natural fit. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #63 w 0.125 What a beautiful film, visually and thematically. When Elinor had realized Edward was not married, I threw my hands at the screen saying "Go to him!". Could not get enough of Mrs. Jennings' laugh either. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.831 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film beautiful visually and thematically, expressing enthusiastic engagement with its characters and romance. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a beautiful film visually and thematically, emotionally invested, enjoyed Mrs. Jennings. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a beautiful film visually and thematically, and describes enjoying the emotional scenes and Mrs. Jennings' laugh. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film as visually and thematically beautiful and expresses strong emotional engagement with the characters. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film beautiful and enthusiastically enjoys key moments and characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film beautiful and expresses strong enjoyment of its characters and emotional moments. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film beautiful visually and thematically, and enthusiastically describes engagement with scenes and characters. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a beautiful film and expresses strong emotional engagement and enjoyment. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Just came back from it and man what a wonderful movie. Saw it with my friends and the whole time we were giggling and laughing in the best way possible. I knew the stuff that was gonna happen so it was fun to see my friends shock and reaction at certain moments. Plus all of us… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.996 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the movie, praising its gorgeous cinematography, charm, cast chemistry, and relatable characters. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it wonderful, praises gorgeous cinematography, charm, and cast chemistry; says they really loved it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise: calls it wonderful, loved the cinematography, charm, cast chemistry, and the overall theater experience. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie, praising its charm, cast chemistry, and gorgeous cinematography. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the charming film, chemistry, cinematography, and theater experience. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They repeatedly praise the film as wonderful, charming, gorgeous, and say they loved it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it a wonderful movie, loved the cinematography, charm, and cast chemistry, and says they loved it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a wonderful movie, praises the cinematography, cast chemistry, and overall theater experience. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #65 w 0.123 Just got out of this and thought it was pretty solid remake / adaptation, and really well crafted. I guess I just wish I could connect with it more, the film to me kinda lacked a spark or some passion if that makes sense. I thought the performances were good (esp George MacKay)… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.97 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite praising craftsmanship and performances, they ultimately found the film flat, lacking passion and emotional connection. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises craft, performances, visuals and pacing, but says it lacked spark and felt flat overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises craft, performances, cinematography and pacing, but says it lacked spark and felt flat, so no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praised craft, pacing, performances, and cinematography as solid, but felt it lacked spark and ultimately fell flat. Grok 4.7: negative — Solid craft, but ultimately flat and hard to connect with. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Praises the craft, performances, and atmosphere, but says it lacked passion and ultimately felt flat. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.97 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises craftsmanship and performances, but criticizes the film for lacking passion and feeling flat. | + | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 I agree. I remember the Ang Lee version as much stronger emotionally. I think the audience falls for Mr. Willoughby along with Marianne much more in that version, so the emotional impact is more powerful VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.843 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Finds this version less emotionally powerful than Ang Lee’s, particularly in developing the audience’s attachment to Willoughby. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the Ang Lee version is emotionally stronger, implying this adaptation has less emotional impact. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the Ang Lee version is much stronger emotionally, implying this film is weaker; agrees with a prior criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the Ang Lee film for its strong emotional impact and effective characterization compared to another adaptation. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the Ang Lee film as emotionally stronger and more powerful. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the Ang Lee version is much stronger emotionally, implicitly judging this version less favorably. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the Ang Lee version is 'much stronger emotionally' and more powerful, implying approval of that adaptation, though it isn't the film under discussion. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comparing the emotional impact of different versions without judging this specific film. | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | + | + | − | + | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 Loved this so much more than I though I would. Incredible cinematography and natural light. Really good cast chemistry all around. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.871 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Loved the film more than expected, praising its cinematography, natural lighting, and cast chemistry. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved it more than expected; praises cinematography, lighting, and cast chemistry. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved it more than expected and praises the cinematography, natural light, and cast chemistry. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and praises its cinematography, lighting, and cast chemistry. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film; praised cinematography, light, and cast chemistry. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the film and praise its cinematography and cast chemistry. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film more than expected, praising cinematography and cast chemistry. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter loved the film, praising the cinematography, cast chemistry, and exceeding expectations. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #68 w 0.12 I was taken by the cinematography too! I know some people want a more colorful film but idk this hit a spot for me VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.188 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the cinematography and says the film’s visual style hit the spot despite others wanting more color. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the cinematography and says the film hit a spot for them despite others wanting more color. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was taken by the cinematography and says the film 'hit a spot' for them, defending its less colorful look. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the cinematography and states that the film 'hit a spot' for them. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the cinematography and says the film hit a spot for them. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the cinematography and say the film’s look worked for them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the cinematography and says the film 'hit a spot for me', a clear positive verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the cinematography and states the film hit the right spot. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Agreed! I loved how many shots there were of the scenery and the actors slowly walking into frame. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.742 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They loved the scenery shots and the actors’ slow entrances into frame. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter agrees and says they loved the scenic shots and the framing of the actors. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter agrees with prior praise and explicitly says they loved the scenery shots and the actors' slow entrances into frame. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the cinematography and blocking of the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the scenery shots and slow actor entrances. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly says they loved the film’s scenic shots and staging. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter says they loved the scenery shots and slow walk-ins, expressing clear approval of the film's style. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the cinematography and pacing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #70 w 0.119 My favorite kind of movie really VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling it their favorite kind of movie clearly expresses approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says it's their favorite kind of movie, expressing clear enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it their favorite kind of movie, an clear expression of liking the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly states it is their favorite kind of movie, indicating clear enjoyment. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it their favorite kind of movie, clear praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it their favorite kind of movie expresses clear enthusiasm. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it is their favorite kind of movie, expressing clear enthusiasm for the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses strong affection for the movie's genre or style. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #71 w 0.118 Idk if it was just my theater/projection, but man this was visually dark. I love the concept of the natural lighting but there’s a way to do it that artfully highlights what happens on screen. I felt like I was missing out on the cinematography and letting it sing . VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes overly dark visuals that obscured the cinematography, despite appreciating the natural-lighting concept. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes overly dark visuals obscuring the cinematography; likes the concept only, with no praise of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the visual darkness as hurting the cinematography, saying they felt they were missing out; praise of the concept is outweighed by disappointment. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's overly dark lighting and feels it ruined the cinematography. Grok 4.7: negative — Disappointed the natural lighting was too dark and obscured the cinematography. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They felt the film’s dark visuals obscured the cinematography and diminished their viewing experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.883 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the visual darkness and feels they missed out on the cinematography. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #72 w 0.117 I thought the cinematography was one of the best parts of the movie. The rain and nature was so beautiful and cozy VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.88 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the cinematography and describes the rain and nature as beautiful and cozy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises cinematography as a highlight, calling the rain and nature beautiful and cozy. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises cinematography as one of the best parts, calling the rain and nature beautiful and cozy; no criticism offered. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the movie's cinematography and atmosphere as beautiful and cozy. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's cinematography as one of its best parts. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s cinematography and describe its visuals as beautiful and cozy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the cinematography as one of the best parts, calling the rain and nature beautiful and cozy. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the cinematography and aesthetic of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #73 w 0.116 I agree! Some of the interior shots were so dark I couldn't see the actors' faces! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.474 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes excessively dark interior shots that obscured the actors' faces. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Agrees with criticism; complains interior shots were too dark to see actors' faces. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's cinematography for being too dark to see faces; a technical complaint with no offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the film's lighting and cinematography, noting interior shots were too dark to see the actors. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes interior shots as too dark to see faces. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film's dark interior shots for making the actors' faces hard to see. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Complains that interior shots were too dark to see faces, a technical criticism of the film with no praise offered. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticized the cinematography for being too dark to see actors' faces. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Best part was Fiona Shaw coming in and wrecking the misery with her cheerful insistence on being kind . And the parade of terrible dead animals given in kindness, too. I also loved that shot of London surrounded by greenery. And the crowded parties. But: - Marianne, you look… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.977 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite several criticisms, they call it a feel-good film and a lovely way to spend two hours. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Several criticisms, but the overall lean is positive: 'feel-good film and a lovely way to spend two hours.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Lists several specific criticisms but concludes it was a feel-good, lovely way to spend two hours; overall leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite several specific criticisms, the commenter concludes that overall it was a lovely, feel-good film. Grok 4.7: positive — Lists several flaws but overall calls it a lovely feel-good film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite several criticisms, the commenter calls it a feel-good film and a lovely way to spend two hours. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.977 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite several specific criticisms of characters and scenes, the user concludes it was a feel-good film and lovely. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 This is a lovely thread! I was bummed to see on the jane austen reddit that people were really upset with this film… I am a huge Austen fan and I thought this film was wonderful. While Ang Lee’s version feels lighter, it spends a lot of time establishing Wiloughby and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.998 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.25 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls this adaptation wonderful and enthusiastically praises its casting, character portrayals, and romantic chemistry. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the new film wonderful, praises Brandon's casting as perfect and the portrayals; compares it favorably to Lee's version. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film wonderful, praises Brandon as 'fantastic, perfect', and prefers its casting and chemistry over the 1995 version, despite small concessions. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they thought the film was 'wonderful' and praises the casting and character portrayals. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film as wonderful, praising casting, chemistry, and performances. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call this version wonderful, praise its casting and performances, and say they believe the central romance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the adaptation wonderful and praises its casting and performances, despite a few criticisms of other versions. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite some mixed comparisons and critiques of other versions, the commenter states this film is wonderful and praises specific aspects. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #76 w 0.114 Absolutely loved this! Beautifully shot, with really expressive actors and a strong emotional heart. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.96 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the film, praising its cinematography, expressive acting, and emotional heart. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for the cinematography, the acting and the emotional core. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they absolutely loved it and praises the cinematography, acting, and emotional core. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and praises its cinematography, acting, and emotion. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved the film; praises visuals, acting, and emotion. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly loved the film and praises its visuals, acting, and emotional impact. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they absolutely loved the film, praising its cinematography, acting, and emotional heart. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'absolutely loved this' and praises the cinematography and emotional heart. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #77 w 0.113 This was my first S&S and I liked it, but I need to see it again. The cast was great and I'm impressed they got so many characters packed in, but some of them had only 1-2 scenes. I don't think this will rise to the comfort movie level that 2005 P&P is, but maybe it will grow… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.955 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly liked it and praised the cast, despite reservations about limited character scenes and rewatch appeal. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they liked it and praises the cast; minor reservations about thin characters and comfort-movie status. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — VADER 0.955 Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked the movie and praised the cast, despite a few minor reservations. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked it; mild caveats don't outweigh the overall lean. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked the film and praised its cast, despite wanting a rewatch and noting some characters felt underused. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.955 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user states "I liked it" and praises the cast and adaptation, despite some minor criticisms. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #78 w 0.113 There are a few Persuasion adaptations, but I think the big failing with them is they proceed to make Anne too dowdy and old. She absolutely is "altered" from what she once was, but a young lady not even 30 would presumably look a bit better. Although few books have been failed… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.881 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes adaptations of Persuasion and Mansfield Park, not Sense and Sensibility. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Persuasion and Mansfield Park adaptations; no judgement of Sense and Sensibility itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses Persuasion and Mansfield Park adaptations, not Sense and Sensibility, and gives no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses adaptations of other Jane Austen novels (Persuasion, Mansfield Park) rather than Sense and Sensibility. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses other Austen adaptations, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses adaptations of other Austen novels without judging Sense and Sensibility. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.881 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses adaptations of other Austen books, not this specific film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 Mansfield Park will forever have the problem that the cripplingly shy, conservative Fanny doesn't fit people's idea of what an Austen heroine should be. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.276 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses Mansfield Park's heroine and audience expectations, without judging Sense and Sensibility. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Mansfield Park's heroine, not a judgement of Sense and Sensibility. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses Mansfield Park's heroine and reception, not Sense and Sensibility, and gives no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a different Jane Austen story (Mansfield Park) and expresses no opinion on Sense and Sensibility. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses Mansfield Park and Fanny, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Mansfield Park and its heroine, without judging Sense and Sensibility. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on Mansfield Park's heroine, not a judgement of Sense and Sensibility itself; no verdict on this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a book character in general without judging the film adaptation. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 The 1995 Persuasion is still amazing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Praises Persuasion, a different film, without judging Sense and Sensibility. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises a different film (Persuasion), not Sense and Sensibility; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises a different film (1995 Persuasion), not Sense and Sensibility; no judgement of the film under discussion. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises a different film ('Persuasion') and expresses no opinion on 'Sense and Sensibility'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises 1995 Persuasion, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises a different film, not Sense and Sensibility. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment praises the 1995 Persuasion, a different film, not Sense and Sensibility; no verdict on this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a different movie (Persuasion) rather than Sense and Sensibility. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 Absolutely loved this, but admittedly I’ve never seen the Ang Lee version. I know I need to. And it sounds like I will have viewed them in the correct order! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.73 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly says they absolutely loved this version, despite not having seen the Ang Lee adaptation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they absolutely loved the film; mention of the Ang Lee version is just context. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they absolutely loved the film; the mention of not having seen the Ang Lee version doesn't undermine their verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they "Absolutely loved this" film. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they absolutely loved this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they absolutely loved this film; the comparison to Ang Lee's version doesn't weaken that praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'absolutely loved' the film; the Ang Lee remark is incidental and not a criticism. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'absolutely loved this'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #82 w 0.11 I liked the film. i thought Daisy was wonderful. Esme was okay though her scenes tend to drag. i thought the colonel was dull but overall i liked it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.727 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly says they liked the film overall, despite some dragging scenes and a dull colonel. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — States liking the film overall despite minor criticisms of pacing and a dull character. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they liked the film overall and praised a performance, despite minor criticisms of pacing and a dull character. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states twice that they liked the film overall despite some minor criticisms. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked the film overall despite some dull scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked the film overall despite finding some characters or scenes less engaging. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they liked the film overall despite criticizing some scenes and the colonel as dull. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'overall i liked it' despite minor criticisms. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Oh finally the s***** over the pond get their release and we can talk about this film. Biggest complaint was it went very neutered with the colour scheme and style. Watching it I found I wanted a little more "spring" and colour in the screen. Esmé Creed-Miles also was verging… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.99 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite stylistic criticisms, they found it warmly comforting and intend to rewatch it repeatedly. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Criticizes colour and casting but ultimately calls it a lovely warm comfort they'll rewatch many times. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes the muted colours and Dakota Johnson, but ends warmly, calling it a comforting hug they'd rewatch; faint praise leaning slightly positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite minor complaints about visuals, they found the movie a 'lovely warm comfort' and plan to rewatch it often. Grok 4.7: positive — Style complaints aside, calls it a warm comforting film they'll rewatch often. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite visual and excitement criticisms, they call it a lovely, comforting film they expect to rewatch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.99 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite some complaints about the color scheme and acting, they ultimately found it to be a warm comfort they will rewatch. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 I enjoyed it a lot, more than what I thought going in. The cast absolutely killed it, especially Esme Creed-Miles (who overshadowed a bit Edgar-Jones in my opinion) and George Mackay (who is a super underrated actor. I mean he is amazing and he should be in more movies,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.971 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They enjoyed it greatly, praising the cast, emotional impact, and gorgeous cinematography, and explicitly calling it a success. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it a lot, praises cast and cinematography, calls it a success. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed it more than expected, praised the cast and cinematography, and called it a success for them. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film, praising the cast, cinematography, and emotional impact. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it more than expected; praises cast, emotion, and cinematography as a success. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they enjoyed it, praise the cast and cinematography, and call it a success. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Enjoyed it a lot, praises cast and cinematography, calls it a success for them. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film a lot and called it a success. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 Loved love loved it. My mum who's a huge fan of the old movie gives it a 10/10, dont know how many times a year she rewatches the old ones, this might be another one she's gonna start rewatching too haha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.962 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the film and reports their mother rated it 10/10 and may rewatch it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved it; mum rated it 10/10 and may rewatch it repeatedly. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved it, and their mum, a fan of the older film, gave it 10/10 and may rewatch it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and their mother rated it 10/10. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved it and cites a 10/10 rewatch recommendation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter enthusiastically says they loved the film and expects it to become a rewatch favorite. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'Loved love loved it' and their mum gives it 10/10; clear enthusiastic endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'loved love loved it' and gives high praise. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Gorgeous film. Came in with zero recall of the story and I was riveted by how messy these people got. Glad we live in a time where women no longer have to plot their moves based on the whims of fuckass men. As someone with a natural allergy to period dramas, giving this 4/5 is… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.935 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it gorgeous and riveting, awarding 4/5 despite usually disliking period dramas. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it gorgeous, was riveted, and gives 4/5 despite disliking period dramas. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a gorgeous film, was riveted, and gives 4/5 despite an allergy to period dramas. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it a 'gorgeous film', says they were 'riveted', and gives it a 4/5 rating. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it gorgeous and riveting, rates 4/5 as high respect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it gorgeous and riveting, and gives it 4/5 despite usually disliking period dramas. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it gorgeous, riveting, and gives it 4/5 as a high rating despite disliking period dramas. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Called it a gorgeous film, was riveted, and gave it 4/5 despite disliking period dramas. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #87 w 0.107 On one hand, I'm like yay the normies are enjoying Jane Austen. On the other hand, I'm like this was such a disappointing take on my 2nd favorite Jane Austen book. The darkness, Colonel Brandon's mumbling, the weird AF dancing (I can't remember what Elinor/Edward were talking… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.978 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the adaptation disappointing and trash, criticizing pacing, melodrama, acting, and directing despite its visual appeal. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it a disappointing take and 'trash', listing many flaws in pacing, melodrama, and direction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter calls the film 'trash' and a disappointing adaptation, criticizing pacing, melodrama, and acting choices; only 'pretty' visuals get a nod. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly calls the film "disappointing" and "trash," criticizing its pacing, acting, and melodrama. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the adaptation disappointing trash despite finding it pretty. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the adaptation disappointing and trash, criticizing its pacing, acting, dancing, and melodrama despite finding it pretty. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.978 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie 'disappointing', 'trash', and criticizes its darkness, pacing, and melodrama. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #88 w 0.106 Just went to see it yesterday with one of my best friends. The theater was packed with other young women and their friends. It was the most fun I’d had at the theaters in a long time. The audience was gripped from the very beginning. There was laughter, cheers, boos, tears, and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.998 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the acting, visuals, relationships, and adaptation choices, and explicitly recommends the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of acting, visuals, sisterhood, and balance; highly recommends the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of acting, cinematography, sisterhood themes and audience experience; explicitly ends with 'I highly recommend' the movie. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the beauty, acting, and chemistry, explicitly stating they highly recommend the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film, acting, and sisterhood; highly recommends it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the movie beautiful, praises its acting and characters, describes an exceptionally engaging theater experience, and highly recommends it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Loved the film, found it beautiful, acting incredible, and explicitly highly recommends it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie and 'highly recommend' it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #89 w 0.105 I've never read this book, I've never seen any other movies. I didn't know anything about this going in. Boy is this movie mostly quite depressing. Fully half of it is one sister or the other just crying over a man. I don't particularly like Pride & Prejudice, but I much… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.809 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Dislikes the film’s persistent gloom, repetitive crying, and desaturated visuals, preferring Pride & Prejudice despite disliking it. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it a depressing downer, gloomy visually, and prefers Pride & Prejudice, which they don't even like. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the film as a depressing, gloomy downer with constant crying, and says they preferred Pride & Prejudice, which they don't even like. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film as a gloomy, depressing downer and dislikes it more than another movie they don't like. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film a gloomy downer and prefers another adaptation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found the film depressing and gloomy, and preferred Pride & Prejudice to it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.809 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter describes the film as depressing, a downer, and visually gloomy, and preferred another movie. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Just saw it this weekend and I absolutely adored it. Really great adaptation, and I reread the book like a week ago to make sure I would be giving a fair critique while watching it. Daisy Edgar Jones was amazing but Fiona Shaw really wowed me and if the world was fair she would… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.985 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Absolutely adored the adaptation, praised performances, dismissed flaws as nitpicks, and plans yearly rewatches. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Adored it, praises adaptation and actors; minor nitpicks; plans yearly rewatches. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they absolutely adored it, praises adaptation and performances, only nitpicky criticisms, plans to rewatch yearly. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they adored the film, praised the performances, and plans to rewatch it regularly. Grok 4.7: positive — Adored the film and plans yearly rewatches; criticisms called nitpicky. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They adored the film, praised the adaptation and performances, and plan to rewatch it despite minor criticisms. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.985 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user adored the adaptation, called it great, and stated it is on their rewatch list despite minor nitpicks. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 I saw this today and really loved it. Daisy edgar-jones and George MacKay were brilliant conveyed so much with their eyes and facial expressions. Fiona Shaw stole every scene. The rest of the cast strong bar Eliot Sumner as Mr Palmer, it was distracting I just kept thinking of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.812 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the film, praised the performances, and felt emotionally moved despite minor casting criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really loved it, praised lead performances and emotional ending; minor casting gripes don't outweigh overall enthusiasm. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really loved it, praises the leads and Fiona Shaw, and was welling up at the end; minor casting quibbles. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really loved it' and praises the performances despite minor casting/appearance distractions. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film and was moved, despite a few distracting casting choices. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really loved it, praise the performances, and were moved by the ending despite a couple of distractions. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.812 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly states they 'really loved it' and were 'welling up by the end', despite minor cast criticisms. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 Loved it, but it's a lot more dour than the 1995 movie. I'm uncertain if thats because of one or the other being more book accurate (i've not read the book and only watched the 95 film for the first time recently), but I liked the older one more. Very beautiful though. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.89 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved it and praised its beauty, despite finding it dour and preferring the 1995 adaptation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says 'loved it' and 'very beautiful'; prefers the 1995 version but leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they loved it and found it very beautiful; preferring the 1995 version is only a comparison, not a rejection of this film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and found it very beautiful, despite preferring an older adaptation. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it and found it beautiful, despite preferring the 1995 version. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved this film and found it beautiful, despite preferring the 1995 version. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.89 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Loved elements and called it beautiful, but ultimately preferred the 1995 version. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 I was very disappointed. The darkness was over the top. I had difficulty seeing the faces of the actors. It never improved. It literally caused eye strain to watch it. The shaky camera in the outdoor walking scenes was nausea inducing. Col Brandon was underwhelming. Absolutely… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.957 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Explicit disappointment with lighting, camerawork, and characters; states they will never watch this version again. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Very disappointed; criticizes dark cinematography, shaky camera, weak characters; will never watch again. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Explicitly disappointed, criticizes cinematography, dark lighting, shaky camera and casting, and says they will never rewatch this version. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter was very disappointed, criticized the cinematography and casting, and stated they will never watch it again. Grok 4.7: negative — Disappointed by darkness, camera, and characters; will never rewatch. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They were very disappointed, criticize the film’s visuals and characters, and say they will never watch this version again. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter was very disappointed, criticizes darkness, camera, and acting, and says they will never watch it again. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses strong disappointment, cites technical and artistic flaws, and states they will never watch it again. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |